Thanks Mark for the pointer! -John On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, not a bug, certainly its the intended behavior (though the name is a > bit tricky isn't it? I've actually thought about that in the past myself). > If you check out the javadoc on Fieldable youll find: > > /** Expert: > * > * If set, omit term freq, positions and payloads from postings for this > field. > */ > void setOmitTf(boolean omitTf); > > - Mark > > > John Wang wrote: > >> Thanks Mark!I don't think it is documented (at least the ones I've read), >> should this be considered as a bug or ... ? >> >> Thanks >> >> -John >> >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Drops positions as well. >>> >>> - Mark >>> >>> >>> >>> On Dec 18, 2008, at 4:57 PM, "John Wang" <john.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi: >>> >>> >>>> In lucene 2.4, when Field.omitTF() is called, payload is disabled as >>>> well. Is this intentional? My understanding is payload is independent >>>> from >>>> the term frequencies. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> -John >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
