Re: "did you mean" for multi-word queries implementation

22 feb 2007 kl. 19.22 skrev Otis Gospodnetic: I believe it's a SpellChecker implementation deficiency, and Karl will probably suggest looking at LUCENE-626 as an alternative. And I'll ask you to please report back how much better than the contrib SpellChecker Karl's solution is. :) The

Re: "did you mean" for multi-word queries implementation

I believe it's a SpellChecker implementation deficiency, and Karl will probably suggest looking at LUCENE-626 as an alternative. And I'll ask you to please report back how much better than the contrib SpellChecker Karl's solution is. Otis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .