22 feb 2007 kl. 19.22 skrev Otis Gospodnetic:
I believe it's a SpellChecker implementation deficiency, and Karl
will probably suggest looking at LUCENE-626 as an alternative. And
I'll ask you to please report back how much better than the contrib
SpellChecker Karl's solution is.
:)
The package level documentation for the refactor of LUCENE-626
available in (and dependent to) LUCENE-550 might be helpful even
though the API looks a bit diffrent. At least it describes a bit more
how it works.
It is available as HTML at this location:
http://ginandtonique.org/~kalle/javadocs/didyoumean/org/apache/lucene/
search/didyoumean/package-summary.html
--
karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
