er Tô
Bacc. en Informatique et Génie Logiciel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(450)434-8905
- Message d'origine -
De: Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Vendredi, Février 9, 2007 12:38 pm
Objet: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: Question concerning Analyzers
> The query should b
Informatique et Génie Logiciel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(450)434-8905
- Message d'origine -
De: Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jeudi, Février 8, 2007 5:13 pm
Objet: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: Question concerning Analyzers
> See below
>
> On 2/8/07, Xavie
TECTED]>
Date: Jeudi, Février 8, 2007 5:13 pm
Objet: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: Question concerning Analyzers
> See below
>
> On 2/8/07, Xavier To <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for helping me.
> >
> > I don't really understand wha
ge d'origine -
De: Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jeudi, Février 8, 2007 12:51 pm
Objet: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: Question concerning Analyzers
> Well, you've proved that your problem is that the analyzer you're
> using when
> querying isn't matching wha
, Février 8, 2007 12:51 pm
Objet: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: Question concerning Analyzers
> Well, you've proved that your problem is that the analyzer you're
> using when
> querying isn't matching what you use during indexing. I think that
> whatyou've done will l
y adding a space after each token except
for the last one, but is there a clean way to do it ? I'm using
WhitespaceTokenizer.
Thanks a bunch !
Xavier Tô
Bacc. en Informatique et Génie Logiciel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(450)434-8905
- Message d'origine -----
De: Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROT
e: Mercredi, Février 7, 2007 4:28 pm
Objet: Re: Re : Re: Question concerning Analyzers
> Then the analyzer you're using when parsing the query is stripping
> them. It
> must be different than the one you use when indexing somehow. At least
> that's the only explanation I can
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mercredi, Février 7, 2007 3:15 pm
Objet: Re: Question concerning Analyzers
> There is no requirement that you use the same analyzer to search as
>
> you used to index. So, yes, you could certainly index things and
> ignore them during a search.
>
oblem ?
Xavier Tô
Bacc. en Informatique et Génie Logiciel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(450)434-8905
- Message d'origine -
De: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mercredi, Février 7, 2007 3:15 pm
Objet: Re: Question concerning Analyzers
> There is no requirement that you use t
d
show you if the analyzer you use to parse the query is doing something you
dont expect.
D.
-Original Message-
From: Xavier To [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 February 2007 19:10
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Question concerning Analyzers
Hi, me again
I'm still stuck
There is no requirement that you use the same analyzer to search as
you used to index. So, yes, you could certainly index things and
ignore them during a search.
Erik
On Feb 7, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Xavier To wrote:
Hi, me again
I'm still stuck with my search engine, but something p
Well, at the very worst, you can use a different analyzer at search time
than you do at index time. I can imagine you create your own analyzer by
subclassing, say, StandardAnalyzer and use your custom analyzer at search
time
Otherwise, you can't have a stock analyzer do one thing when indexin
Hi, me again
I'm still stuck with my search engine, but something popped in my head : Can an
analyzer index something but ignore it during a search ? I'm asking this
because now that I've been searching for an answer, I've come to think that I
should redo the whole search engine, but I don't wa
13 matches
Mail list logo
