Then the analyzer you're using when parsing the query is stripping them. It must be different than the one you use when indexing somehow. At least that's the only explanation I can imagine....
Perhaps, somehow, you are using a default analyzer when you parse a query? Or you aren't specifying the field when you query and thus a default is used? Or you are using a PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper and dropping through to the default? or ???? Just for yucks, I'd try using WhitespaceAnalyzer on a query with something you *know* exists in the index for a particular field and work my way up to whatever your real problem is in small steps (since you can't post code <G>)...... Best Erick On 2/7/07, Xavier To <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Erik and Erick, I guess my question was rather unclear, but you guys answered it all the same : it is impossible for an analyzer to index something and having the same analyzer ignore the thing indexed during a search. If it makes everything clearer, during indexation, numbers are indexed, whether or not they are accompanied by letters ( 2003 and 4wd are both indexed). That's fine, since we want this. The problem occurs when I try to search for them : They are ignored. I know they are indexed because I ran through the index using Luke. Any thoughts regarding this problem ? Xavier Tô Bacc. en Informatique et Génie Logiciel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (450)434-8905 ----- Message d'origine ----- De: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mercredi, Février 7, 2007 3:15 pm Objet: Re: Question concerning Analyzers > There is no requirement that you use the same analyzer to search as > > you used to index. So, yes, you could certainly index things and > ignore them during a search. > > Erik > > > On Feb 7, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Xavier To wrote: > > > Hi, me again > > > > I'm still stuck with my search engine, but something popped in my > > > head : Can an analyzer index something but ignore it during a > > search ? I'm asking this because now that I've been searching for > > > an answer, I've come to think that I should redo the whole search > > > engine, but I don't want to reproduce the same error as we have > > now. It would be stupid to accidentaly redo the same mistake. I > > still haven't received news from my seniors about me posting code > > > and all... > > > > Xavier Tô > > Bacc. en Informatique et Génie Logiciel > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > (450)434-8905 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
