Re: Fuzzy vs Prefix query Performance

2009-06-15 Thread mark harwood
er@lucene.apache.org Sent: Monday, 15 June, 2009 15:34:18 Subject: Re: Fuzzy vs Prefix query Performance Well, if you're seeing it, it's possible But the first question is always "what were you measuring?" Be aware that when you open a searcher, the first few quer

Re: Fuzzy vs Prefix query Performance

2009-06-15 Thread Zsolt Koppany
Erick, this a web application running 24 hours a day thus caching cannot be the reason. I get the same result after I re-start the same search. Zsolt Erick Erickson wrote: Well, if you're seeing it, it's possible But the first question is always "what were you measuring?" Be aware that

Re: Fuzzy vs Prefix query Performance

2009-06-15 Thread Erick Erickson
Well, if you're seeing it, it's possible But the first question is always "what were you measuring?" Be aware that when you open a searcher, the first few queries can fill caches, etc and may take an anomalously long time, especially if you're sorting. So could you give more details of your t

Fuzzy vs Prefix query Performance

2009-06-15 Thread Zsolt Koppany
Hi, on 99470 documents (I mean Lucene documents) a FuzzyQuery needs approx 30 seconds but PrefixQuery less than one. All Lucene files need 65MB together. I'm bit surprised of that. Is that possible? Zsolt Zsolt Koppany Phone: +49-711-67400-679 --