Erick,
this a web application running 24 hours a day thus caching cannot be the
reason. I get the same result after I re-start the same search.
Zsolt
Erick Erickson wrote:
Well, if you're seeing it, it's possible <G>....
But the first question is always "what were you measuring?" Be aware
that when you open a searcher, the first few queries can fill caches, etc
and
may take an anomalously long time, especially if you're sorting. So could
you give more details of your test setup?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Zsolt Koppany <zkoppanyl...@intland.com>wrote:
Hi,
on 99470 documents (I mean Lucene documents) a FuzzyQuery needs approx 30
seconds but PrefixQuery less than one.
All Lucene files need 65MB together.
I'm bit surprised of that. Is that possible?
Zsolt
Zsolt Koppany
Phone: +49-711-67400-679
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
