gt; Thanks,
> Jarvis .
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Karl Wettin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 2:45 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: About the search efficiency based on document's length
>
> 21 sep
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 2:45 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: About the search efficiency based on document's length
21 sep 2007 kl. 08.23 skrev Jarvis:
There is a question about the document’s length and search
efficiency.
Two ways to index some html p
some solution ?
Thanks,
Jarvis .
-Original Message-
From: Karl Wettin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 2:45 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: About the search efficiency based on document's length
21 sep 2007 kl. 08.23 skrev J
21 sep 2007 kl. 08.23 skrev Jarvis:
There is a question about the document’s length and search efficiency.
Two ways to index some html pages(ignore some information): one is
both
store and index the html content in lucene dictionary, the other is
just
index the content . For the first met
Hi everyone,
There is a question about the document’s length and search efficiency.
Think of this situation:
Two ways to index some html pages(ignore some information): one is both
store and index the html content in lucene dictionary, the other is just
index the content . For the first method i
