This may be of interest: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/200707.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers Mark ----- Original Message ---- From: Karl Wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Friday, 21 September, 2007 8:35:05 AM Subject: Re: About the search efficiency based on document's length 21 sep 2007 kl. 09.09 skrev Jarvis: > Storing data in a document will not affect search speed. > > This is helpful . Someone should probably confirm that though. > > And another question :) > > When I make a search which will return 500000 results , it will be > very > inefficient when I want to get the document between the No.450000 to > No.450010 or some back document . Why was it ? Or some solution ? I suppose you are referring to the class Hits? It should only be an extra cost if you iterate a lot of documents priot to index 450000, as that will force it to replace the query now and then. It is a pretty simple peice of code. Go right ahead and take a look at it: <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/ apache/lucene/search/Hits.java> -- karl > Thanks, > Jarvis . > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Karl Wettin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 2:45 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: About the search efficiency based on document's length > > 21 sep 2007 kl. 08.23 skrev Jarvis: > >> There is a question about the documents length and search >> efficiency. > >> Two ways to index some html pages(ignore some information): one is >> both >> store and index the html content in lucene dictionary, the other is >> just >> index the content . For the first method is there a efficiency >> problem >> compare to the second besides the folder size increase? > > Not sure I understand your question, but I'll give it a go. > > As far as I know, storing data in a document will not affect search > speed. However, loading large amounts of data to a Document will of > course consume resources. Therefor it is possible to pass a > FieldSelector to the IndexReader when you retrieve a Document, > allowing you to define what fields to ignore, load, lazy load, et c. > > I hope this helps. > > -- > karl > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it now. http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
