* Yes, I understand the first part about two rows and querying.
* The problem is - I'm not the one creating those Analyzers and storing
documents into indexes. All I could say - "add this field to document", it's
as simple as this.
Luckily the system is built using Pico and OSGi, so I will try t
> you
>
> mean "only match the document if the phrase is in a *some* row in the doc",
> it should work.
>
> The SpanNear query should work, as should regular phrase queries.
>
> If this is off base, could you provide some more examples?
>
> HTH
> Erick
>
&g
*Problem description*
- I have a complex multi-value field. So, each value consist from several
rows.
- Each rows consists from several cells/items
I want to be able to match those issues, which have a *row* with cellA="AAA"
and cellB="BBB". Having a search by all the table (meaning - a
Hi Karsten,
Thanks a lot. I finally have got Your idea.
Ok, I think it's worth to do the real job now :) Thanks for the advices,
finally I have understood the directions I could go for it.
>
> do you really need the "Complex scenario"?
>
what kind of query is your use case?
My Query UC is smth
dified and read concurrently all the time, but
> none of these other servers have ever exhibited this bug.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Leonid M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2008 5:35:47 PM
> Subje
* And what's about visibility filter? * Are you sure no one else accesses
IndexReader and modifies index? See reader.maxDocs() to be confident.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Justin Grunau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have some code that uses lucene which has been working perfectly well
> fo
