You got me, thanks a lot.
This is exactly I was trying to ask (meaning find this values within the row
number 2).
I'm afraid I'm not be able to proceed because I have no access to analyzer
configuration (the system - JIRA 4.0) uses the hardcoded pre-configured set
of default analyzers.
Thanks a lot, you provided clear and brief answer to my question.
--
Best regards,
Leonids Maslovs
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I'm not following entirely here, but multi-valued fields are supported.
> Something like (bad pseudo-code here)
> doc = new Document
> doc.add(new Field("rows", <row1 text", stored, indexed));
> doc.add(new Field("rows", <row2 text", stored, indexed));
> indexWriter.addDocument(doc);
>
> If your analyzer implements getPositionIncrementGap, you can keep your
> rows separate (search the mail archives for getPositionIncrementGap for
> more explanation).
>
> Then, if you're searching with a proximity (or phrase) less than your
> increment
> gap, you'll only get matches within a row. You wouldn't get a search
> "against
> a particular row" if, by that phrase, you meant "only look in row 2". If
> you
>
> mean "only match the document if the phrase is in a *some* row in the doc",
> it should work.
>
> The SpanNear query should work, as should regular phrase queries.
>
> If this is off base, could you provide some more examples?
>
> HTH
> Erick
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Leonid M. <leoni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > *Problem description*
> >
> > - I have a complex multi-value field. So, each value consist from
> several
> > rows.
> > - Each rows consists from several cells/items
> >
> >
> > I want to be able to match those issues, which have a *row* with
> > cellA="AAA"
> > and cellB="BBB". Having a search by all the table (meaning - any row
> > cellA="AAA" and any row cellB="BBB") is something I understand and
> > hopefully
> > could easily implement by having different FieldIndexers for each column.
> >
> > *Example:*
> > *
> > *
> > *Field value:*
> > *Row 1: [AAA] [BBB] [XXX]*
> > *Row 2: [CCC] [BBB] [XXX]
> > *
> > I would like to run [CCC][BBB] query to look for rows containing these
> > values and in this case I will get empty result set, since no such field
> is
> > present.
> >
> > *Question*
> > Is there any option to index / look for particular row only?
> >
> > I understand that I could make each row to be a separate document, but it
> > doesn't sit me (it's 3rd party system and I have no access for new
> document
> > creation, all I could do - to extend system's indexing mechanism).
> >
> > So, could I somehow index multiple rows within one document and construct
> > Lucene search against some particular *row*?
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Leonids Malovs
> >
>
