On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:41 PM, McKinley, James T
wrote:
> We really don't have the option of moving to local disk without a significant
> redesign of our systems. However, we do have the possibility of switching to
> iSCSI instead of NFS without changing our hardware, do you happen to know
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your response. We've been using NFS for 10 years with Lucene and
never saw index corruption until we moved to 4.x if I remember correctly. We
are aware of the locking and other issues you mentioned with NFS, but they've
not been much of a problem for us. You're probably c
Sure, that's fine, as long as the link to PublishMavenArtifacts remains.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
> Steve,
> A single line step is likely to be missed. That's why I added those
> commands inline. Wouldn't it be better to just add the two missing steps
> On Sep 30, 2015
Steve,
A single line step is likely to be missed. That's why I added those
commands inline. Wouldn't it be better to just add the two missing steps
On Sep 30, 2015 6:42 PM, "Steve Rowe" wrote:
> I pulled the maven publishing stuff out into its own page to declutter the
> main ReleaseTodo page. I
I pulled the maven publishing stuff out into its own page to declutter the main
ReleaseTodo page. I don’t think it’s a great idea to put an example of a
subset of the required steps here - Noble, your example leaves out two
following steps: after staging you have to go close the repository and
I have been editing the steps whenever I miss something during the
release process.
It is easy to miss an item if it is a link to another page. I just
edited to add an inline example to maven publishing
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Hi Noble,
>
> Is there something
Thanks Mike. This is very informative.
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 3:22 PM
To: Lucene Users
Subject: Re: Lucene 5 : any merge performance metrics compared to 4.x?
No, it is not possible to disable, an
Hi Uwe,
Wav!!! Thanks a lot. I changed to StandardAnalyzer it is working. Thank
you, thank you.
Regards,
Bhaskar
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi Bhaskar,
>
> the answer is very simple: Your analysis is not useful for the type of
> queries and data you are using. Yo
