Got the same problem. Running 1.5.0_05 on Solaris 10. I've seen that
this issue has been reported on Sun's forum but no answer yet.
Another interesting thing which I noticed. We previously used the
RAMDirectory and we never got JVM-crashes when using RAMDirectory.
However, once we started using FS
Hi Eric, I'm in the same situation, I wouldn't normally ask something
related to hibernate here but I posted something similar in the
hibernate forums on Jan 16th but still haven't got any response.
http://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?t=954137&highlight=lucene
It is really obvious that if
The source code to Lucene in Action (www.lucenebook.com) has an
example of extending the built-in QueryParser to use SpanNearQuery
for in-order phrase searching instead of the default unordered
PhraseQuery behavior. That example will show how to use
SpanNearQuery made up of SpanTermQuery's
This should be possible using a HitCollector with the
IndexSearcher.search() method, and throwing an exception from the
HitCollector when the time limit as expired.
Erik
On Feb 7, 2006, at 5:55 PM, RONALD MANTAY wrote:
Hi ,
I am working on a search application using lucene
A cursory reading of your code looks ok ... stemming shouldn't be an issue
as long as your measure of success is comparing docs that match your
orriginal query with the counts you get out.
What i mean by that is that any stemming should have already been taken
care of when your query object was c
: Ok, I'm quite new to lucene so I don't really know how the Default
: Similarity works but from what I gather it is a variation of the
: cos-similarity. And the cos-measure penalizes extraneous terms
: therefore, how can the score be 1.0?
If you are using hte Hits API then the score you are seein
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Feb 7, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Daniel Noll wrote:
I've got an unusual (if not crazy) question about implementing custom
queries.
Basically we have a UI where a user can enter a query and then select
a bunch of filters to be applied to the query. These filters are
currently
Hi ,
I am working on a search application using lucene where I would like
application to stop searching and return the hits colleted to date and an
appropriate exception, when reaching either a threshold of
a) xx seconds of processing time.
or
b) on finding xxx documents
Hi ,
I am working on a search application using lucene where I would like
application to stop searching and return the hits colleted to date and an
appropriate exception, when reaching either a threshold of
a) xx seconds of processing time.
or
b) on finding xxx documents
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 22:06, RONALD MANTAY wrote:
> Hi, can any one help, I am new to lucene.
>
> Due to requiring a specific Query syntax, I have created a bespoke query
parser to build a boolean query which at any time may comprising a mixture
of :
>
> a) Fuzzy terms with
Hi, can any one help, I am new to lucene.
Due to requiring a specific Query syntax, I have created a bespoke query
parser to build a boolean query which at any time may comprising a mixture of :
a) Fuzzy terms with similarity level set according to length of term.text
b) Wild C
So is blogdigger and a few others :)
--- "Mordo, Aviran (EXP N-NANNATEK)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Technorati is based on lucene
>
> -Original Message-
> From: çä¸è±ªä¾ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:40 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sub
Technorati is based on lucene
-Original Message-
From: 盖世豪侠 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:40 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Does anybody here do some efforts about RSS/Blog search?
I'm interested in this topic.
See if we can exchange some ide
Hey all, I was looking around last night and found a thread from last
July on this list concerning SIPs. I was wondering if any code has been
made available, or if anyone else has had success (and their solutions)
using Lucene for generating these.
thanks,
l
I'm interested in this topic.
See if we can exchange some ideas.
On Feb 7, 2006, at 5:47 AM, Simon Porritt wrote:
Field.Text("index", "New York")
...which of course means that the string is tokenized before being
indexed. Running this search:
new yo
which translates to
index:new index:yo
returns New York amongst the results, as well as any cities
s
On Feb 7, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Daniel Noll wrote:
I've got an unusual (if not crazy) question about implementing
custom queries.
Basically we have a UI where a user can enter a query and then
select a bunch of filters to be applied to the query. These
filters are currently implemented using
Hi Revati,
If I am not wrong you must be using hibernate intercepter to get the evens on
value objects. You will get all lifecycle event in the class so you should
handle lucene index addition/updation/deletion there.
But I had faced locking problem with hibernate as multiple writers get opened
Daniel Noll wrote:
Is it possible to customise the QueryParser so that it returns Query
instances that have no relationship to the text index whatsoever?
The syntax that Lucene's QueryParser supports isn't very complicated.
I'm sure you could write your own parser from scratch, perhaps with s
You may likely get better response by posting in the Hibernate list.
Erik
On Feb 7, 2006, at 7:58 AM, revati joshi wrote:
Hello lucene members,
i'm the silent member of this
group.last week i had sent some query regarding reindexing,but i
dn't
Hello lucene members,
i'm the silent member of this group.last
week i had sent some query regarding reindexing,but i dn't received any reply
from any one.Still i'm stuck up with the same problem of reindexing.
i hve completed with the reindexing code using h
I had the same problem (almost exactly, even down to searching city
names) and the way I solved it was to provide my own tokenizer that
doesn't tokenize -- I'm passing in stuff to the analyzer already
tokenized, so in your example I'd pass in "new york" as a single entity
to analyze, and the tokeni
Hello,
We have a document type for which we wish to create an index that may
contain spaces, and we don't want the values to be tokenized. The data
is a list of cities. We are currently creating the index using Field.Text:
Field.Text("index", "New York")
...which of course means that the s
I have an index of roughly 2 million docs making up almost 200GB and I
can't seem to merge any additional indexes into it. Here is the error
I continuously get, always with the Index: 85, Size: 13
I couldn't find much in the previous mailing list posts nor on 'ol
faithful Google.
help/ideas?
jav
24 matches
Mail list logo
