In Re: to a post from 24-Mar-2005 by Matt Quail, in reference ... I'm
seeing this same exception (Windows, Lucene 1.4.3, Sun JDK 1.5.0_03) that
occurs repeatedly for me, but only during the course of running all my
application's unit tests in Ant. When I run the individual unit test I
can't get the
Quoting Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Regarding Luke - actually, it would not be so difficult to implement
> this (at least for me ;-) ). Save for some minor exceptions, Luke opens
> an IndexReader once, and I could add another version of the Open dialog
> to use open multiple indexes.
>
: On another note, is there any support for before/after phrase queries? I need
to
: construct a query that is able to search for documents where specific phrases
: must appear in a fixed order in a document. For example, "Nobel Prize" must
: occurr before "Roger Penrose" which must occurr before
KW Kor wrote:
Hi folks,
Just wondering, is there a Lucene graphical user interface that supports
searching over multiple indexes? Normally I'ld use Luke, but it does not
support MultiSearcher and it looks difficult to hack Luke.
Hi,
Regarding Luke - actually, it would not be so difficult to impleme
Thanks all for the info. Otis was correct, I'm just using NFS for
the space, not for multiple machines having access. If we ever have to
have multiple machines, we now know what problems we will need to deal
with.
As for performance of the NFS vs Local we will need to do some tests
and decide w
On May 18, 2005, at 2:33 PM, KW Kor wrote:
On another note, is there any support for before/after phrase
queries? I need to
construct a query that is able to search for documents where
specific phrases
must appear in a fixed order in a document. For example, "Nobel
Prize" must
occurr before "
Hi folks,
Just wondering, is there a Lucene graphical user interface that supports
searching over multiple indexes? Normally I'ld use Luke, but it does not
support MultiSearcher and it looks difficult to hack Luke.
On another note, is there any support for before/after phrase queries? I need to
c
On May 17, 2005, at 4:33 PM, Batalov, Denis wrote:
Seems like a simple question, but I could not find it in recent
archives.
Are the javadocs for 1.9 available on-line anywhere?
Not currently, at least not on the official Lucene site.
Or, if not, where can I get the source of 1.9 in a single tar
On May 18, 2005, at 9:54 AM, Albert Vila wrote:
Hi all,
I need to retrieve all terms from an specified field filtered for
another field. For example,
Document 1 ->
Document 2 ->
Document 3 ->
Document 4 ->
Hi
I catch the TooManyClauses Exception in my application, and when I show
the exception message get null value. This behavior is bad I think,
don't help to found cause of errors. Now I use e.getClass() + ": " +
e.getMessage() in my catch statement.
result: org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery$
Hello,
I'm trying to use JDBCDirectory in my project. Now (the project) is
working fine with FSDirectory, but if i simple replace FSDirectory with
JDBCDirectory the things don't go well: I can create the index, but when
try to connect (to insert a document) i find a corrupted index. Looking
datab
Hi all,
I need to retrieve all terms from an specified field filtered for
another field. For example,
Document 1 ->
Document 2 ->
Document 3 ->
Document 4 ->
Then, I want to retrieve al
Vince Taluskie writes:
> Richard,
>
> In an earlier note, I mentioned using an Netapp R100 for storage of our
> indexes and content - so I can say that Lucene definitely works accessing
> over NFS. I think this is more for updating/merging the same indexes across
> multiple systems simultaneous
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Le 18 mai 05, à 11:51, John Haxby a écrit :
I haven't tried this, but under Linux (at least), you can specify the
"nolock" parameter to make file locking appen locally. Of course,
this will make it impossible to use NFS to share the index among
several machines, but, as O
Richard,
In an earlier note, I mentioned using an Netapp R100 for storage of our
indexes and content - so I can say that Lucene definitely works accessing
over NFS. I think this is more for updating/merging the same indexes across
multiple systems simultaneously and once the indexes are there -
Le 18 mai 05, à 11:51, John Haxby a écrit :
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I haven't used Lucene with NFS. My understanding is that the problem
is with lock files when they reside on the NFS server. Yes, you can
change the location of lock files with a system property, but if you
are using NFS to make t
>>>Did you use a readwrite lock? If you did, do you know how the
>
> performance of new readers is effected if a single write is processed?
> ??Every request for a reader has to wait untill the writer is finished..
No, I'm not using that kind of read/write lock. In fact, you can open multiple
rea
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I haven't used Lucene with NFS. My understanding is that the problem
is with lock files when they reside on the NFS server. Yes, you can
change the location of lock files with a system property, but if you
are using NFS to make the index accessible from multiple machines,
My company would like to make the following contribution to Lucene (in
sandbox?) licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0.
Background: While doing project work on a web-based search engine we
have developed a component called LuceneIndexAccessor. This component
provides a high-level index
Hi *,
i know how to handle stop words and synonyms, but how to handle related words?
red <-> orange (70% sim)
red <-> pink (60% sim)
red <-> yellow (20% sim)
When i got things right it's not possible to store this information at index
time.
Do i have to expand related words at query time?
qu
20 matches
Mail list logo
