Perhaps xerces should auto add a wider group of commiters as was done in Apache
Commons, in order to spur activity
Original message
From: Michael Glavassevich
Date: 1/11/18 3:29 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: j-users@xerces.apache.org
Subject: Re: Any Xerces-J 2.12.0 release date to a
On 1/14/18, 10:30 PM, "Will Herrmann" wrote:
> I’m interested in becoming a committer, although admittedly, I’m only
> interested in building a new release that fixes
> this bug (which was previously stated to already be in the code). What do I
> need to do to make that happen?
Probably the b
It’s necessary to get my employer on file even if I’m not doing it on company
time? Also, in my case, I both have an employer and am self-employed (side
job). How does that work?
-Will
> On Jan 15, 2018, at 4:39 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>
> On 1/14/18, 10:30 PM, "Will Herrmann" wrote:
>
>>
On 1/15/18, 5:41 PM, "Will Herrmann" wrote:
> It’s necessary to get my employer on file even if I’m not doing it on company
> time?
That depends on the jurisdiction, I couldn't answer that for you. Most US
states are, I think, work for hire, meaning your employer owns anything you do
that is
Alright, in that case, how do I go about getting an Apache CLA on file with my
employer being involved?
-Will
> On Jan 15, 2018, at 4:45 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>
> On 1/15/18, 5:41 PM, "Will Herrmann" wrote:
>
>> It’s necessary to get my employer on file even if I’m not doing it on
>> com
On 1/15/18, 5:47 PM, "Will Herrmann" wrote:
> Alright, in that case, how do I go about getting an Apache CLA on file with
> my employer being involved?
Well, the CLA files are split into the two types.
http://apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide#cla
The Corporate one is the one that would hand
