On 1/15/18, 5:47 PM, "Will Herrmann" wrote:
> Alright, in that case, how do I go about getting an Apache CLA on file with
> my employer being involved?
Well, the CLA files are split into the two types.
http://apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide#cla
The Corporate one is the one that would hand
Alright, in that case, how do I go about getting an Apache CLA on file with my
employer being involved?
-Will
> On Jan 15, 2018, at 4:45 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>
> On 1/15/18, 5:41 PM, "Will Herrmann" wrote:
>
>> It’s necessary to get my employer on file even if I’m not doing it on
>> com
On 1/15/18, 5:41 PM, "Will Herrmann" wrote:
> It’s necessary to get my employer on file even if I’m not doing it on company
> time?
That depends on the jurisdiction, I couldn't answer that for you. Most US
states are, I think, work for hire, meaning your employer owns anything you do
that is
It’s necessary to get my employer on file even if I’m not doing it on company
time? Also, in my case, I both have an employer and am self-employed (side
job). How does that work?
-Will
> On Jan 15, 2018, at 4:39 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>
> On 1/14/18, 10:30 PM, "Will Herrmann" wrote:
>
>>
On 1/14/18, 10:30 PM, "Will Herrmann" wrote:
> I’m interested in becoming a committer, although admittedly, I’m only
> interested in building a new release that fixes
> this bug (which was previously stated to already be in the code). What do I
> need to do to make that happen?
Probably the b
Perhaps xerces should auto add a wider group of commiters as was done in Apache
Commons, in order to spur activity
Original message
From: Michael Glavassevich
Date: 1/11/18 3:29 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: j-users@xerces.apache.org
Subject: Re: Any Xerces-J 2.12.0 release date to a
