Re: [TizenIVI 3.0]Tizen IVI 3.0 porting for ARM

+ ivi list From: , Tracy Graydon mailto:tracy.gray...@intel.com>> Date: Monday, May 12, 2014 at 2:01 PM To: Yang Andy mailto:williamyan...@hotmail.com>> Subject: Re: [TizenIVI 3.0]Tizen IVI 3.0 porting for ARM Hi Andy, I recommend that you take a look at https://bugs.tizen.org/jira/browse/DEVT

Re: [TizenIVI 3.0]MirrorLink

I’ll open a bug to get profile/ivi/mirrorlink_client and profile/ivi/vncstack_mirrorlink_client repos deleted. -Tracy From: "Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC)" mailto:dominig.arf...@fridu.net>> Date: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 at 2:33 AM To: "ivi@lists.tizen.org" mailto:ivi@li

Re: [TizenIVI 3.0]MirrorLink

https://bugs.tizen.org/jira/browse/TINF-586 On 5/13/14, 4:27 PM, "Graydon, Tracy" wrote: >I¹ll open a bug to get profile/ivi/mirrorlink_client and >profile/ivi/vncstack_mirrorlink_client repos deleted. > >-Tracy > >From: "Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC)" &g

Re: Building Tizen with Yocto tool initial delivery

I am in the process of trying this out on Fedora 20. Ran into a couple of minor things that may or may not be relevant for documentation purposes, etc. Should I send this stuff to someone in particular or would you prefer a Jira bug with the details? Tracy On 5/14/14, 12:30 PM, "Dominig ar

Re: Building Tizen with Yocto tool initial delivery

ts.tizen.org>" mailto:ivi@lists.tizen.org>> Subject: Re: Building Tizen with Yocto tool initial delivery Tracy Best are Jira bug allocated to Ronan (in copy) Dominig Le 15 mai 2014 01:11, "Graydon, Tracy" mailto:tracy.gray...@intel.com>> a écrit : I am in the proce

Re: How to install/uninstall the Native App on tizen-ivi?

I presume you are trying to uninstall this on a running system? In that case, you should be able to do a “zypper remove” of the dialer package. i.e. zypper remove . Maybe you have tried this already? Tracy From: bray mailto:bray_w...@163.com>> Date: Thursday, May 29, 2014 at 6:20 PM To: "iv

Re: Expansion errors during GBS build

It sounds like you might need a different build.conf. The full gbs build will use the build.con from the scm/meta repo. That is not necessarily the most recent, or specific build.conf you would want. The project config that is in scm/meta/build-config is dated. You might try using a more recent

Re: Expansion errors during GBS build

IVI [mailto:ivi-boun...@lists.tizen.org] On Behalf Of Graydon, Tracy >Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 2:37 AM >To: ivi@lists.tizen.org >Cc: Anoop Babu >Subject: Re: Expansion errors during GBS build > >It sounds like you might need a different build.conf. The full gbs buil

Re: [IVI] Upgraded kernel

It was just accepted and finished building. Should be in a snapshot shortly. -t From: , Kevron mailto:kevron.m.r...@intel.com>> Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 11:20 AM To: "VanCutsem, Geoffroy" mailto:geoffroy.vancut...@intel.com>> Cc: "ivi@lists.tizen.org" mailto:ivi@l

Re: [IVI] Error while building "gst-plugins-base" on x86

I took a look at this and there is something a little weird going on here. I built the 2.0 branch and got the same error, which is, indeed, an unpackaged file. The strange thing is that the version in OBS, which is allegedly the same version, builds. The commit ID and tag are the same as the one

Re: [IVI] Error while building "gst-plugins-base" on x86

There is definitely something odd happening here. I wound up having to disable the video4linux in the configure options to get this to build both locally and in OBS. OBS seems to not be building the video4linux stuff, even when it is (theoretically) enabled. Or more correctly, not explicitly di

Re: [IVI] Error while building "gst-plugins-base" on x86

Hi Deepak, Glad that did the trick. I disabled the video4linux stuff in the package itself, so now it builds with both GBS and in OBS, as it should. This turned out to be an issue with GBS using one version of kernel-headers and OBS using another. Since we don't currently use the video4linux st

Re: A problem of booting Tizen IVI

Our images expect a boot device of sdb1 by default. If you check the fstab on your system, you may find it is set to sdb while the actual device is sda. You may need to edit accordingly. Tracy From: "letoem...@gmail.com" mailto:letoem...@gmail.com>> Date: Tuesday, J

Re: 回复: Re: A problem of booting Tizen IVI

_ Best Regards 发件人： letoem...@gmail.com<mailto:letoem...@gmail.com> 发送时间： 2013-07-24 13:15 收件人： Graydon, Tracy<mailto:tracy.gray...@intel.com>; Li, Hao H<mailto:hao.h...@intel.com>; ivi<mailto:ivi@lists.tizen.org> 主题： Re: Re: A problem of booting Tizen IVI OK

Re: Phoronix test suite on Tizen IVI

It doesn't appear that the phoronix-test-suite actually exists in the Tizen repos. The benchmarks pattern is not an IVI-specific pattern. It is actually coming from the "common" Tizen patterns. That is, it is in meta-common and not in meta-ivi. In any case, it is not currently available in the repo

Re: Phoronix test suite on Tizen IVI

FYI: https://bugs.tizen.org/jira/browse/TBD-8 On 8/7/13 9:28 PM, "Graydon, Tracy" wrote: >It doesn't appear that the phoronix-test-suite actually exists in the >Tizen repos. The benchmarks pattern is not an IVI-specific pattern. It is >actually coming from the "co

Re: Tizen IVI repositories enabled by default in the image

The main reason the snapshot repos are enabled by default in snapshots is cuz…well…they are snapshots. lol Since developers are using them to test their changes, and RE uses them to do smoke testing, it was the most intuitive choice for that. We obviously want to use the corresponding repos for

Re: A failed report of gbs build

No, anything that has not had the rpmlint errors fixed in the git repos will fail to gbs build. That is correct behavior since we wouldn't want people to be able to build and submit something against old rpmlint rules and then fail when submitted to OBS. Someone correct me if I am wrong here, bu

Re: A failed report of gbs build

2013 at 12:00:25PM -0700, Rusty Lynch wrote: >> This report is of an instance of local builds not matching the server... >> i.e. the webkit-efl package, which is building successfully on the >> server, unable to build locally because of rpmlint issues. >> >> >&

Re: A failed report of gbs build

Webkit rebuilt successfully in OBS with 10 errors, 79 warnings. I also built it successfully on my Fedora 17 system. Interestingly, the number of warnings was different: 10 errors, 81 warnings. Anyway, it is building successfully in OBS. -t On 8/15/13 10:23 AM, "Graydon, Tracy&qu

Re: Tizen IVI repositories enabled by default in the image

This is a perfect time to re-ask the question that Geoffroy asked the other day... Should we change the default repo to be daily instead of snapshots? If QA is testing daily images against snapshot repos because that is the default, that's a good argument for changing the default to daily. The qu

Re: Tizen IVI repositories enabled by default in the image

Yanshuang, Mikko: do you agree? On 8/16/13 12:05 PM, "Abramski, Adam M" wrote: >Comments in line > >-Original Message- >From: ivi-boun...@lists.tizen.org [mailto:ivi-boun...@lists.tizen.org] On >Behalf Of Graydon, Tracy >Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 11

Re: Tizen IVI repositories enabled by default in the image

Excellent. I will make this change today. :) On 8/18/13 10:29 PM, "Ylinen, Mikko" wrote: >On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Graydon, Tracy > wrote: >> Yanshuang, Mikko: do you agree? > > >Yes, I'm OK with the change. > >-- Mikko > > >

Re: Another tizen build failure on the most recent release - nothing provides pkgconfig/mm-sound

Hi Steven, Which branch of apps/core/preloaded/volume-app are you trying to build? The version number in the output is 0.2.4, which suggests you may be trying to build the master branch, which would be for Tizen 1.0, against the Tizen 3.0 repos. The Tizen 3.0 version of org.tizen.volume is 0.2.

Re: Process for bare metal build of IVI?

Apparently one can also use gbs to create an image. I just tried it and it does work. It's obviously just a wrapper around mic itself. "gbs cr -K " can be used to generate an image. "Gbs build" will build a package from source. I suppose one could use it to build everything and then generate an

Re: Another tizen build failure on the most recent release - nothing provides pkgconfig/mm-sound

By the way, Steven, your .gbs.conf looks fine (from previous email). Given the version number of the package showing in your build logs, I don't think you are building the tizen branch. If you do a git branch -a and it does show "* tizen", then there is probably something whacked with your local p

Re: Process for bare metal build of IVI?

<mailto:phanc...@jaguarlandrover.com> --- Business Details: Jaguar Land Rover Limited Registered Office: Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry CV3 4LF Registered in England No: 1672070 On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Graydon, Tracy mailto:tracy.gray...@intel.com>> wrote: Ap

Re: Another tizen build failure on the most recent release - nothing provides pkgconfig/mm-sound

te unclear as to which sources are supposed to be used. For any package I see, if there is no "tizen" branch does that mean it is out of date? Or does a package with tizen2.2, for instance, still something that 3.0 uses? I am still terribly unclear on that. On 20 August 2013 11:04, G

Re: What git TAG was used to build the IVI M2 Aug release?

That was my understanding as well. Deleting gerrit projects that have been included in releases will skew history and ability to replicate build. And, of course, anyone using a previously released manifest to rebuild from source will get borked by the missing repo. If using a current manifest from

Changes to IVI Snapshots and Releases on download.tizen.org

I have made some changes in the last couple of days what IVI publishes where on download.tizen.org. You may be asking, "Dear God, what has she done now?" ;) Here's what I have done…. We now have two sets of images on download.tizen.org. One set is for Tizen:IVI. The other is for Tizen:IVI:Rele

Update on Build Infrastructure Status

We are experiencing issues with the OBS backend and OBS is effectively completely down at present. The “backend” and tools team is hard at work root causing and sorting out the issues, but we don’t have an ETA on resolution at this point. There are some details on the situation in the Jira tic

Update on Build Infrastructure Status

The OBS issues appear to be resolved. OBS is back up and responsive once again. We are watching it closely to keep tabs on stability. So far so good. It should be fine for people to start re/submitting things to OBS. If you do not see acceptance notices or it looks like there is an incorrect/ol

Re: Frequency of build breaks ?

Hi Mark, Well, much depends on how you define “build breaks.” If we are talking about the relative stability of images, which is what I think you are saying, then yes, it definitely goes up and down depending on what we are trying to accomplish at a given point in the development cycle. You do

Re: Frequency of build breaks ?

o:phanc...@jaguarlandrover.com> --- Business Details: Jaguar Land Rover Limited Registered Office: Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry CV3 4LF Registered in England No: 1672070 On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Graydon, Tracy mailto:tracy.gray...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi Mark, Well,

Re: gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10 for tizen ivi

A note on the gstreamer 0.10 manifest thingŠ The issue here is that we have two versions of gstreamer and related packages: 1.x and 0.10.x. The 1.x version comes from the tizen git branch. The 0.10.x version is coming from the tizen_2.1_compat branch. This is causing problems with the manifest beca