Re: [PR] Fix missing support in Consumer for other request types. [solr-sandbox]

2023-11-06 Thread via GitHub
sigram merged PR #81: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox/pull/81 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache

Re: [PR] Fix missing support in Consumer for other request types. [solr-sandbox]

2023-11-02 Thread via GitHub
markrmiller commented on PR #81: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox/pull/81#issuecomment-1790415703 Been a little while since I've looked at that code, but ... Yes, the Kafka client is not thread safe. The design is a single thread polls the queue and hands off records to an

Re: [PR] Fix missing support in Consumer for other request types. [solr-sandbox]

2023-11-02 Thread via GitHub
sigram commented on PR #81: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox/pull/81#issuecomment-1790406978 @markrmiller I'm not sure I understand everything of what's going on in `sendBatch` with workUnit. However, using executor here seems wrong because Kafka client is NOT thread-safe. If I'm

[PR] Fix missing support in Consumer for other request types. [solr-sandbox]

2023-10-31 Thread via GitHub
sigram opened a new pull request, #81: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox/pull/81 When the support for other request types (ADMIN, CONFIGSET) was added part of the original patch hasn't been applied, namely the changes to `KafkaCrossDcConsumer.pollAndProcessRequests()` that allowed