dsmiley merged PR #3253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3253
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.or
epugh commented on PR #3253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3253#issuecomment-2713409914
There is a commented out .bats test in `test_packages.bats` that you could
run. It requires a live internet connection which is why we don't run it in CI
that tests out github..
> This t
dsmiley commented on PR #3253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3253#issuecomment-2714548138
Thanks for pointing out the commented out test. It passes now, after I
updated it (the URL didn't seem to work exactly as it was).
As you can hopefully agree/observe here, Jackson is
epugh commented on code in PR #3253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3253#discussion_r1989361358
##
solr/packaging/test/test_packages.bats:
##
@@ -58,22 +58,24 @@ teardown() {
}
# This test is useful if you are debugging/working with packages.
-# We have commented i
dsmiley opened a new pull request, #3253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3253
The use of a SolrClient didn't seem to make sense if the web server isn't
(necessarily) Solr. Seemed to be getting more in the way. There was some
double or even triple(?) JSON back & forth parsing / s
