[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17810179#comment-17810179
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-16580:
---
The reason this was added was because it was inter
risdenk opened a new pull request, #2218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2218
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-X
# Description
Please provide a short description of the changes you're making with this
pull request.
# Solution
Pl
olevchyk commented on PR #17:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-docker/pull/17#issuecomment-1906932751
> Curious, how did you notice this? Won't the Dockerfile simply fallback to
using SOLR_DIST_URL and SOLR_ARCHIVE_URL and it still works?
attaching a part of the build log
```
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17810099#comment-17810099
]
Houston Putman edited comment on SOLR-16580 at 1/23/24 8:36 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17810099#comment-17810099
]
Houston Putman commented on SOLR-16580:
---
This is causing reproducible failures on b
janhoy commented on PR #17:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-docker/pull/17#issuecomment-1906869196
Curious, how did you notice this? Won't the Dockerfile simply fallback to
using SOLR_DIST_URL and SOLR_ARCHIVE_URL and it still works?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
olevchyk commented on code in PR #17:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-docker/pull/17#discussion_r1463854141
##
8.11-slim/Dockerfile:
##
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ ENV SOLR_USER="solr" \
SOLR_UID="8983" \
SOLR_GROUP="solr" \
SOLR_GID="8983" \
-
SOLR_CLOSER_URL="http
Jason Gerlowski created SOLR-17128:
--
Summary: Upgrade to Lucene 9.9.2
Key: SOLR-17128
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17128
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Securi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Gerlowski updated SOLR-17128:
---
Fix Version/s: 9.5.0
> Upgrade to Lucene 9.9.2
> ---
>
>
janhoy commented on code in PR #17:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-docker/pull/17#discussion_r1463810790
##
8.11-slim/Dockerfile:
##
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ ENV SOLR_USER="solr" \
SOLR_UID="8983" \
SOLR_GROUP="solr" \
SOLR_GID="8983" \
-
SOLR_CLOSER_URL="http:/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl resolved SOLR-17127.
Resolution: Information Provided
Hi,
We do not accept broad "security scan reports" as this, pleas
dsmiley opened a new pull request, #2217:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2217
Avoid O(N^2) for many collections.
The arg to retain(col) should ideally always be a Set.
---
FYI this fixed an issue in production with tens of thousands of collections.
Mind boggling; I kn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17809709#comment-17809709
]
Calvin Smith edited comment on SOLR-17120 at 1/23/24 5:47 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17810055#comment-17810055
]
Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-17059:
Hi Anusha - starting in Solr 8.9, the de
olevchyk opened a new pull request, #17:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-docker/pull/17
the URL 8.11.2 for download is currently broken, not sure what would be the
correct source but I set it to be the same
https://solr.apache.org/downloads.html
--
This is an automated message from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17810044#comment-17810044
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-17112:
-
bq. Exactly which version of L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17810040#comment-17810040
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-17112:
-
To test using Google's colab,
dsmiley commented on code in PR #2202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2202#discussion_r1463627890
##
solr/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ Improvements
* SOLR-17096: solr.xml now supports declaring clusterSingleton plugins (Paul
McArthur, David Smiley)
+* SOLR
janhoy commented on PR #2215:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2215#issuecomment-1906513076
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17126
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
janhoy opened a new pull request, #2216:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2216
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17126
Targeting 9.6 for this since 9.5 release is already rolling. Therefore also
using a separate JIRA number
--
This is an automated message from the
cpoerschke commented on PR #2214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2214#issuecomment-1906437975
> LGTM - do you want to handle merging @cpoerschke , or should I? Don't want
to step on your toes here...
Thanks @gerlowskija - I'm happy to handle the merge and cherry-picking to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael Rios Saavedra updated SOLR-17127:
Description:
There are several components affected by CVEs in solr: 8.11.2 and 9.4.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael Rios Saavedra updated SOLR-17127:
Description:
There are several components affected by CVEs in solr: 8.11.2 and 9.4.
Rafael Rios Saavedra created SOLR-17127:
---
Summary: update comp
Key: SOLR-17127
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17127
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Task
Security Level:
gerlowskija commented on code in PR #2214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2214#discussion_r1463400754
##
solr/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ Bug Fixes
* SOLR-17090: The v2 "delete alias" API no longer errantly returns a 405
status code (Jason Gerlowski)
+* S
gerlowskija commented on PR #2214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2214#issuecomment-1906214351
> 21 tests failed, all of which were in
org.apache.solr.s3.S3BackupRepositoryTest or
org.apache.solr.s3.S3OutputStreamTest
Solr has some test-flakiness issues, and the S3 tests ar
Jan Høydahl created SOLR-17126:
--
Summary: Cut over System.getProperty() to EnvUtils for modules
Key: SOLR-17126
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17126
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Ta
ycallea commented on PR #2202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2202#issuecomment-1906160411
> Can a CHANGES.txt entry be proposed here? I suppose this is an
"Improvement", though I can sympathize why you filed the JIRA issue as a bug.
I agree classifying it as a bug could be
janhoy commented on code in PR #2184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2184#discussion_r1463332602
##
.github/workflows/stale.yml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# This workflow warns of PRs that have had no activity for a specified amount
of time.
+#
+# For more information, see
cpoerschke commented on code in PR #2214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2214#discussion_r1463320201
##
solr/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ Bug Fixes
* SOLR-17090: The v2 "delete alias" API no longer errantly returns a 405
status code (Jason Gerlowski)
+* SO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17809919#comment-17809919
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-15960:
Commit e
janhoy merged PR #2193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2193
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
32 matches
Mail list logo
