dsmiley commented on code in PR #2126:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2126#discussion_r1445581541
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/core/NodeConfig.java:
##
@@ -223,17 +221,23 @@ private NodeConfig(
if (this.clusterSingletonPlugins != null
&& this.c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl resolved SOLR-13612.
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Error 500 with update extract handler on Solr 7.4.0
> -
mcarroll1 opened a new issue, #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/675
Hello,
I found it difficult to specify additional volumes in the
`podOptions.volumes` values, specifically specifying a source for the volume.
It appears @janhoy had a similar issue here:
htt
janhoy opened a new pull request, #2184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2184
Following Lucene's lead and adding a stale bot that will label open,
non-draft PRs as `Stale` after 14 days of inactivity. It is almost identical
fork of Lucene's config:
https://github.com/apache/lucene
aaronsuns commented on issue #671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/671#issuecomment-1881736950
Update:
create a service account and SCC could run it on openshift without the above
change in solr-operator.
```
# Service Account
apiVersion: v1
kind: Servi
uschindler commented on PR #2183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2183#issuecomment-1881612565
It looks like all tests pass. Would you please add an entry to the
CHANGES.txt file in the 9.5 section:
https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/91a19404fc90929b70c8513a058cfb1d560496da/solr/C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17804391#comment-17804391
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-16397:
Commit 1
risdenk commented on PR #2178:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2178#issuecomment-1881525273
So having the `swagger-jaxrs2-jakarta` is ok even though we are in theory on
javax still with Jetty? I have a hard time wrapping my head around when javax
vs jakarta matters :/
--
This is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17804386#comment-17804386
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-16397:
Commit 9
gerlowskija merged PR #2128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2128
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apach
uschindler commented on code in PR #2183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2183#discussion_r1444777176
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/function/FileFloatSource.java:
##
@@ -307,7 +307,8 @@ private static float[] getFloats(FileFloatSource ffs,
IndexReader re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17804335#comment-17804335
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-17036:
Commit 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17804334#comment-17804334
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-17036:
Commit a
haldmour-atypon commented on code in PR #2183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2183#discussion_r1444760037
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/function/FileFloatSource.java:
##
@@ -307,7 +307,8 @@ private static float[] getFloats(FileFloatSource ffs,
IndexRead
uschindler commented on code in PR #2183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2183#discussion_r1444750334
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/function/FileFloatSource.java:
##
@@ -307,7 +307,8 @@ private static float[] getFloats(FileFloatSource ffs,
IndexReader re
haldmour-atypon opened a new pull request, #2183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2183
Correct the log.error to include the file name instead of the hard-coded
value.
`log.error("Error loading external value source + fileName + {}{}", var33,
otherErrors < 10 ? "" : "\tSkippi
gerlowskija commented on code in PR #2128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2128#discussion_r1444641685
##
solr/api/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/api/model/MergeIndexesRequestBody.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
gerlowskija commented on PR #2128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2128#issuecomment-1881015025
> I saw some APIs override the below method to mark it expensive. I believe,
MERGEINDEXES is kind of expensive.
+1 I think it makes sense to give `MergeIndexes` its own `isExpensiv
gerlowskija commented on code in PR #2128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2128#discussion_r1444641685
##
solr/api/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/api/model/MergeIndexesRequestBody.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
solrbot opened a new pull request, #2182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2182
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [org.apache.curator:curator-recipes](https://curator.apache.org)
([source](https://togithub.co
20 matches
Mail list logo
