gszadovszky commented on code in PR #466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/466#discussion_r1843395569
##
LogicalTypes.md:
##
@@ -609,6 +609,17 @@ that is neither contained by a `LIST`- or `MAP`-annotated
group nor annotated
by `LIST` or `MAP` should be interp
wgtmac commented on code in PR #3060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3060#discussion_r1843397209
##
parquet-hadoop/src/test/java/org/apache/parquet/hadoop/TestParquetWriter.java:
##
@@ -524,4 +527,71 @@ private void testParquetFileNumberOfBlocks(
assertE
Fokko commented on code in PR #3060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3060#discussion_r1843357739
##
parquet-hadoop/src/test/java/org/apache/parquet/hadoop/TestParquetWriter.java:
##
@@ -524,4 +527,71 @@ private void testParquetFileNumberOfBlocks(
assertEq
pitrou commented on code in PR #466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/466#discussion_r1843418984
##
LogicalTypes.md:
##
@@ -609,6 +609,17 @@ that is neither contained by a `LIST`- or `MAP`-annotated
group nor annotated
by `LIST` or `MAP` should be interpreted
Fokko commented on PR #3044:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3044#issuecomment-2478384704
Closing this in favor of https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3063
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
Fokko commented on PR #3063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3063#issuecomment-2478508793
@pan3793 I noticed that the Scala DSL wasn't mentioned to the list, I've
added it 👍
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
etseidl commented on code in PR #466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/466#discussion_r1844245348
##
LogicalTypes.md:
##
@@ -609,6 +609,17 @@ that is neither contained by a `LIST`- or `MAP`-annotated
group nor annotated
by `LIST` or `MAP` should be interprete
steveloughran commented on PR #3061:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3061#issuecomment-2479679353
Looking at this I note that thift is download from apache archives and built
every time. Apache infra might be unhappy about this; archive isn't replicated
the way others are a
Fokko merged PR #3052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3052
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@parquet.
Fokko merged PR #3054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3054
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@parquet.
Fokko merged PR #3053:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3053
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@parquet.
steveloughran commented on PR #3061:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3061#issuecomment-2478643711
> I think we want to include the Hadoop 2 Github Actions as well
I wanted to see what what happened there. Let me work on that.
--
This is an automated message from the
wgtmac commented on issue #3043:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/issues/3043#issuecomment-2478997069
Thanks for reporting this issue! I can confirm that it has been reproduced
on my side. Will take a look later.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
steveloughran commented on issue #2943:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/issues/2943#issuecomment-2478727692
w.r.t format testing, got some more thoughts there which would actually be
* make some/all the benchmark tests subclass of the (stable) hadoop fs
contract tests in h
Fokko opened a new pull request, #3063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3063
### Rationale for this change
Based on the `[DISCUSS]` thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/scdq9t2gvvs4glhq0qx4qcvfp62j793s
### What changes are included in this PR?
Fokko closed pull request #3044: Bump Scala to 2.12.20
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3044
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-m
Fokko closed pull request #3050: MINOR: Bump Hadoop to 3.4.1
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3050
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscrib
Fokko commented on PR #3061:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3061#issuecomment-2478359612
@steveloughran I think we want to include the Hadoop 2 Github Actions as well
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
pan3793 commented on PR #3063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3063#issuecomment-2478455461
Can we leave some words on README or somewhere to mention this removal?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
etseidl commented on PR #466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/466#issuecomment-2479863682
Apologies for muddying the waters, but I'm still trying to get this all
clear in my head. I'm wondering if rather than adding a new rule, can we simply
modify Rule 3 to say
```
alamb commented on PR #456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/456#issuecomment-2479905612
Does anyone know of parquet implementations that implement the variant type?
I would like to try and organize getting this into the Rust implementation
(see https://github.com/ap
etseidl opened a new pull request, #63:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/63
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/469 recently clarified that a
`MAP` in a Parquet file need not have a `values` field in the `key_value`
group. This PR adds `map_no_value.parquet` whi
22 matches
Mail list logo
