Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization

2001-03-22 Thread James A. Sutherland
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jenny Brown (was Gable) wrote: > > > > To that extent, it's been somewhat helpful, but not as much as > > I expected. Mainly, I think, it's because I see women asking > > questions and guys answering... and they're still the experts... > > It's hard

Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization

2001-03-22 Thread James A. Sutherland
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Gina Lanik wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:00:55 +1100, Mary Gardiner writes: > [snipped] > >I think that the reason there are men who answer is that they are > >attracted to a help forum that doesn't have any of the RTFM bullshit > >(which manual huh?). Only men who've been

Re: [issues] ESR's Sex Tips for Geeks

2001-04-04 Thread James A . Sutherland
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 08:59:31 +1000, you wrote: >On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 11:18:42PM -0400, Rick Scott wrote: >> Seeing as I know a lot of people (myself included) don't read >> Slashdot on anything approaching a regular basis, I was wondering >> if anyone had anything to say about: >> >> http://tu

Re: [issues] ESR's Sex Tips for Geeks

2001-04-04 Thread James A . Sutherland
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 20:13:04 +1000, you wrote: >On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:58:15AM +0100, James A. Sutherland wrote: >> Hrm. I'm not exactly an expert on this, but I didn't think pointer >> arithmetic was supposed to be part of the relationship? Granted, "will &g

Re: [issues] ESR's Sex Tips for Geeks

2001-04-06 Thread James A . Sutherland
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001 00:22:27 -0500, you wrote: >From: James A. Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 20:13:04 +1000, Mary wrote: >>>But should it be the first thing on your mind when you meet a woman, any >>>woman. >>> >> Certainly no