In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jenn V. wrote:
>
>WHY are there no pockets in women's clothes? Are we assumed to not want to
>carry things?
1) carrying things is unfeminine. Probably looks as though we *do*
things, rather than sitting around daintily. Can't have that.
2) pockets ruin the line
On Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 06:52:39PM +1100 or thereabouts, Jenn V. wrote:
> Kirrily 'Skud' Robert wrote:
> >
> > I'm with you on that one. It's not just dresses either... womens
> > jackets and trousers often don't have pockets in them at all, let alone
> > numerous or capacious ones.
>
> WHY are
On 16 Jan 2000 06:53:40 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kirrily 'Skud' Robert) said:
>I'm with you on that one. It's not just dresses either... womens
>jackets and trousers often don't have pockets in them at all, let
>alone numerous or capacious ones.
Heh. All of my skirts have at least two pockets.
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 05:14:29 -0500
Kelly Lynn Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heh. All of my skirts have at least two pockets. Guess I buy stuff
> in the wrong places.
My skirts usually don't have pockets... but my suit jackets do. Thank
god for them too, I'd probably have lost all sorts o
