In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jenn V. wrote: > >WHY are there no pockets in women's clothes? Are we assumed to not want to >carry things? 1) carrying things is unfeminine. Probably looks as though we *do* things, rather than sitting around daintily. Can't have that. 2) pockets ruin the line of the clothing, and fashion designers wouldn't want their clothing to be spoilt in that manner, would they? 3) see also: fabrics, washability of; skirts, degree of movement when wearing; blouses and jackets, degree of movement when wearing; shoes, non-slip soles, absence of. K. -- Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://netizen.com.au/ We're all in a box and the instructions for getting out are on the outside. ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- RE: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise Sunnanvind
- [issues] RE: English dominance, was : Demog... Janus
- Re: [issues] RE: English dominance, was... Nils Philippsen
- Re: [issues] RE: English dominance,... Sunnanvind
- RE: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise Sunnanvind
- Re: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise Dan McGarry
- Re: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise Jenn V.
- Re: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise Kirrily 'Skud' Robert
- Re: [issues] Re: Demographics - Rep... Jenn V.
- Re: [issues] Re: Demographics ... Kirrily 'Skud' Robert
- Re: [issues] Re: Demographics ... Telsa Gwynne
- Re: [issues] Re: Demographics ... Sunnanvind
- Re: [issues] Re: Demographics - Rep... Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [issues] Re: Demographics ... Emily Cartier
- RE: [issues] Re: Demographics - Reprise Ian Phillips