> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Julie
> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:04 PM
> To: Mary Gardiner; minae
> Cc: Grrltalk@Linuxchix. Org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [issues] Re: [grrltalk] Re: linuxchix logo
>
> I've heard mixed re
OTECTED]>; "Mary Gardiner"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "minae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Grrltalk@Linuxchix. Org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: [issues] Re: [grrltalk] Re: linuxchix logo
>
On Monday 07 May 2001 12:04 am, Julie wrote:
> > Has anyone else ever had or encountered issues with the name?
>
> I've heard mixed reaction to all the "grrl power" and other such
> reclaimation of "girl", "babe", "chick", etc.
>
> On the other hand, I'm in no position to be critical considering
From: Mary Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 08:01:51PM -0700, minae wrote:
> > It seems to go well with the name
> > "Linuxchix" which sounds to me like it's trying to be a hip, catchy
> > young-sounding moniker. Else why not Linux Women?
>
> Actually now that you bring this
