On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Janus wrote:
> At 09:50 PM 11/29/1999 -0500, you wrote:
> >This in mind, I think that it might be time to change the reply-to
> >address from "list" to "sender".
> I would worry a bit about losing information -- since the human tendency
> seems to be to hit reply without che
At 09:50 PM 11/29/1999 -0500, you wrote:
>
>This in mind, I think that it might be time to change the reply-to
>address from "list" to "sender". What this means is, unless you
>specifically reply to the list (by selecting the appropriate option, or
>by specifying the list address), your response
Note: I'm crossposting this to grrltalk, issues, and techtalk because
telsa brings up some important points which could have an effect on all
these lists. Apologies to everyone who gets this message more than
once.
Telsa Gwynne wrote:
> But since this is techtalk, and since we seem to be discu
