Re: [issues] Software Licensing

2001-06-13 Thread Jen Hamilton
It's not the home environment that concerns me here, but the business environment where PC hardware is always switched/upgraded/tinkered with. I wonder what kind of affect this will have on businesses who are, sometimes exclusively, invested in their products. Jen On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Mary Gard

Re: [issues] Sick of surf and porn addicts

2001-06-04 Thread Jen Hamilton
I think there's another issue here that we haven't mentioned relating the the US vs EU. The US's definition of "Porn" is completely different from other countries. For example, in Japan, Technology Magazines contain advertisements that the US would label as "Pornographic". Jen _

Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization

2001-03-23 Thread Jen Hamilton
This is a classic case where man -k is your friend! (although they probably didn't have that option back in 1983). [jhamilto@attila jhamilto]$ man -k rename mmove (1)- move or rename an MSDOS file or subdirectory '" t mren (1) - rename an existing MSDOS file '" t mv (1)

Re: [issues] Re; modesty?

2001-01-26 Thread Jen Hamilton
> While I agree that women are > more likely to be somewhat modest (defined as slightly underestimating > their skills) I think men are way more likely to overestimate. This was the hardest thing for me to realize when I entered the IT field. If I'm not sure about an issue, I'm way more likely t

Re: [issues] Re: Filtering in schools and libraries

2001-01-17 Thread Jen Hamilton
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Laurel Fan wrote: > Excerpts from linuxchix: 17-Jan-101 Re: [issues] Re: Filtering .. by Jen > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > There's no reason to argue N2H2's effectiveness or in-effectiveness in > > this newsgroup. The issue is censorship, not N2H2. > > On the contrary. The issu

Re: [issues] Re: Filtering in schools and libraries

2001-01-17 Thread Jen Hamilton
to categorize pages is false. Implying that our employees are underpaid is also false. Jen On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Aaron Malone wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 03:47:43PM -0800, Jen Hamilton wrote: > > There's no reason to argue N2H2's effectiveness or in-effectiveness in >

Re: [issues] Re: Filtering in schools and libraries

2001-01-17 Thread Jen Hamilton
There's no reason to argue N2H2's effectiveness or in-effectiveness in this newsgroup. The issue is censorship, not N2H2. Are you really resorting to slandering my company's product in order to prove your point? N2H2 serves over 11,000 schools covering over 9 million students, so for every dissat

Re: [issues] Re: Filtering in schools and libraries

2001-01-17 Thread Jen Hamilton
email address. For the record, I stand by my statements that filtering software is not a useful solution. If I've made any incorrect statements about your company's product, I'd certainly be interested in seeing your perspective. On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Aaron Malone wrote: > O

Re: [issues] Re: Filtering in schools and libraries

2001-01-17 Thread Jen Hamilton
ology without researching the facts about what is available. Jen On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Aaron Malone wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:03:32PM -0800, Jen Hamilton wrote: > > The initial list of what is allowed and what is blocked is determined by > > the person who buys the

Re: [issues] Re: Filtering in schools and libraries

2001-01-16 Thread Jen Hamilton
different from serving up pages that have > been requested by the user. I disagree. How better does that user determine what pages to request? A search engine is the starting point of most research. Jen > Jen Hamilton said: > > My point is that censorship already exists in scho

Re: [issues] Re: Filtering in schools and libraries

2001-01-16 Thread Jen Hamilton
thing they don't have to > Therefore an "opt-out" scheme will never be used. That's simply not true. I would like to think that any teacher or librarian would do everything they can to provide the best possible resources for all of their students. Jen On Tue, 16 Jan 2001,

RE: [issues] Re: Filtering in schools and libraries

2001-01-16 Thread Jen Hamilton
sites containing words deemed > inappropriate -- this leads to blocking of sites about > sexual abuse, breast cancer, etc, etc. So yes, this is > indeed different from the censorship that already > (unfortunately) exists in our libraries/schools. On 16 Jan 2001, Kristin M. Fitzs

RE: [issues] Re: Filtering in schools and libraries

2001-01-16 Thread Jen Hamilton
s are either too stupid or amoral to > make their own decisions. I'm also tired of the government using our kids as > political agendas. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Jen Hamilton &g

[issues] Re: Filtering in schools and libraries

2000-12-27 Thread Jen Hamilton
This question is in regards to the Children's Internet Protection Act in the US. Here's some info: http://www.onlinepolicy.org/action/legpolicy/us00-hr4577-a3610.htm Jen On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Bek Oberin wrote: > Jen Hamilton wrote: > > Since we are on the subject of l

[issues] Filtering in schools and libraries

2000-12-27 Thread Jen Hamilton
our take on the recent legislation for Internet Filtering in libraries and schools. Do you think this is a necessary precaution to protect children from the www? Jen Hamilton ___ issues mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues