From: Mary Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 08:01:51PM -0700, minae wrote:
> > It seems to go well with the name
> > "Linuxchix" which sounds to me like it's trying to be a hip, catchy
> > young-sounding moniker. Else why not Linux Women?
>
> Actually now that you bring this
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 08:01:51PM -0700, minae wrote:
> It seems to go well with the name
> "Linuxchix" which sounds to me like it's trying to be a hip, catchy
> young-sounding moniker. Else why not Linux Women?
Actually now that you bring this up, a lot of my feminist friends are rather
unable
Michelle Murrain wrote:
> But, now that open source is seen as a potential business model, how does
> that change things? And how is being an open-source programmer part of the
> puzzle?
>
> Anyway, I thought this would be an interesting set of issues to discuss and
> ponder.
Definately an
Hi folks,
I've cross-posted this on both techtalk and issues, because it probably
belongs on issues, but it was spurred by the conversation on techtalk about
the story on MS, and it's view of Linux.
I read the original speach (which is at:
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/craig/05-03sh
