Github user rtudoran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3732
@fhueske @stefanobortoli I suggest we merge this temporary solution into
flink (with using a special marker for distinct) until the flink module will be
upgraded to the next calcite release. I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982492#comment-15982492
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6250:
---
Github user rtudoran commented on the issue
GitHub user xccui opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3768
[FLINK-6368][table] Grouping keys in stream aggregations have wrong order
âFLINK-5768 removed the `AggregateUtil.createPrepareMapFunction` stage,
who maps all grouping keys to the first n fields of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982497#comment-15982497
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6368:
---
GitHub user xccui opened a pull request:
Github user zhangminglei closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3758
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user zhangminglei commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3758
@kl0u Yep. I reopened this PR again for waiting you message me. Haha ~
Okay, Now, I will close it and then create another jira and cc you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982521#comment-15982521
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5855:
---
Github user zhangminglei commented on the i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982522#comment-15982522
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5855:
---
Github user zhangminglei closed the pull re
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3768
Thanks for the fix @xccui!
+1 to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982523#comment-15982523
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6368:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
Github user kl0u commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3758
@zhangminglei Perfect!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982527#comment-15982527
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5855:
---
Github user kl0u commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mingleizhang reopened FLINK-5855:
-
> Unprotected access to pendingFilesPerCheckpoint in BucketingSink
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mingleizhang closed FLINK-5855.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Unprotected access to pendingFilesPerCheckpoint in BucketingSink
> ---
Github user tzulitai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3766
Thanks for the PR @fanyon. I'll try to look at the changes soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982531#comment-15982531
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6288:
---
Github user tzulitai commented on the issue
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3765
Hi @haohui, thanks for the PR! I like the approach of the wrapping distinct
aggregator.
Unfortunately, this approach won't work with the upcoming changes for the
the UDAGG interface. The `A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982533#comment-15982533
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6373:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982534#comment-15982534
]
zhijiang commented on FLINK-6337:
-
[~uce], do you think it makes sense to remove the buffe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982545#comment-15982545
]
Ufuk Celebi commented on FLINK-6337:
Hey [~zjwang]! I think the buffer pool is require
Github user twalthr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3768
Thanks for fixing this so quickly @xccui! I will test this fix with my
branch and merge this later today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982555#comment-15982555
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6368:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the issue:
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3720#discussion_r113133585
--- Diff: docs/Gemfile.lock ---
@@ -30,18 +30,19 @@ GEM
redcarpet (~> 3.1)
safe_yaml (~> 1.0)
toml (~> 0.1.0)
-jekyll-
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3720#discussion_r113133944
--- Diff: docs/Gemfile.lock ---
@@ -30,18 +30,19 @@ GEM
redcarpet (~> 3.1)
safe_yaml (~> 1.0)
toml (~> 0.1.0)
-jekyll-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982558#comment-15982558
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6302:
---
Github user zentol commented on a diff in t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982557#comment-15982557
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6302:
---
Github user zentol commented on a diff in t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982574#comment-15982574
]
zhijiang commented on FLINK-6337:
-
Thank you for so quick response!
Currently the buffer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982583#comment-15982583
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6008:
---
Github user NicoK commented on the issue:
Github user NicoK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3512
After investigating a bit further, I noticed that this problem is actually
a bit bigger:
Even in `FileSystemBlobStore`, there is no guarantee that a directory will
not be deleted concurrently (from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Till Rohrmann closed FLINK-6319.
Resolution: Not A Problem
The user reported that the exceptions occurred when cancelling a job. This
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3762
Hi @shaoxuan-wang, I made another pass over the PR and think it looks good.
I can address the changes I suggested and also add a
`SingleElementIterable` instead of using `ArrayList` and finally me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982592#comment-15982592
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6361:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-5711:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.1)
1.2.2
> Deserialization schema that gives has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-6102:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.1)
1.2.2
> Update protobuf to latest version
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-6142:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.1)
1.2.2
> RemoteStreamExecutionEnvironment thro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-5808:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.1)
1.2.2
> Missing verification for setParalleli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-5030:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.1)
1.2.2
> Support hostname verification
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-5908:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.1)
1.2.2
> Blob Cache can (rarely) get corrupted
Github user tonycox commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3760
@ramkrish86 Hi, Thank you for the PR. Could you repush commit?
```
git commit --amend
gut push origin FLINK-5752 -f
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Nico Kruber created FLINK-6380:
--
Summary: BlobService concurrency issues between delete and put/get
methods
Key: FLINK-6380
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6380
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982597#comment-15982597
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5752:
---
Github user tonycox commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kostas Kloudas reassigned FLINK-6208:
-
Assignee: Dawid Wysakowicz
> Implement skip till next match strategy
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982606#comment-15982606
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6075:
---
Github user rtudoran commented on a diff in
Github user rtudoran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3714#discussion_r113143239
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/plan/nodes/datastream/DataStreamSort.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+/*
+
Github user ramkrish86 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3760
@tonycox
Thanks for the comment? Just curious. Any reason for the repush - is it for
checking the test failures again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982607#comment-15982607
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5752:
---
Github user ramkrish86 commented on the iss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982574#comment-15982574
]
zhijiang edited comment on FLINK-6337 at 4/25/17 9:20 AM:
--
Hey [~
Github user gyfora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3766
Hi,
Thanks for the PR!
The first problem I noticed with this approach is that it will not work if
users want to partition dynamically created topics (my use case actually).
We sh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982630#comment-15982630
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6288:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-6374:
--
Component/s: YARN
> In yarn cluster model, the -ys parameter is not take effect.
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-6376:
--
Component/s: YARN
Security
> when deploy flink cluster on the yarn, it is lack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-6377:
--
Component/s: Table API & SQL
> Support map types in the Table / SQL API
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-6373:
--
Component/s: Table API & SQL
> Add runtime support for distinct aggregation over grouped windows
Github user shaoxuan-wang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3762
Hi @fhueske , it is good to have a dedicated Iterable for pair-merge.
Please go ahead. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982650#comment-15982650
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6361:
---
Github user shaoxuan-wang commented on the
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3762
Thanks, will merge then
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982655#comment-15982655
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6361:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
mingleizhang created FLINK-6381:
---
Summary: Unnecessary synchronizing object in BucketingSink
Key: FLINK-6381
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6381
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3736#discussion_r113167440
--- Diff: flink-dist/src/main/assemblies/opt.xml ---
@@ -95,5 +95,12 @@
flink-metrics-statsd-${project.version}.jar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982722#comment-15982722
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6013:
---
Github user zentol commented on a diff in t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982764#comment-15982764
]
shijinkui commented on FLINK-6367:
--
[~greghogan] We need configure some special allow_ori
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982763#comment-15982763
]
mingleizhang commented on FLINK-6381:
-
It seems that currently there are two places sh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982763#comment-15982763
]
mingleizhang edited comment on FLINK-6381 at 4/25/17 11:58 AM:
-
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3720
I can confirm that you can build the docs on W10 with the Linux Subsystem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982763#comment-15982763
]
mingleizhang edited comment on FLINK-6381 at 4/25/17 11:59 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982766#comment-15982766
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6302:
---
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mingleizhang updated FLINK-6381:
Description:
It seems that currently there are two places should not employ the
{{synchronized}} to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mingleizhang updated FLINK-6381:
Comment: was deleted
(was: It seems that currently there are two places should not employ the
{{syn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mingleizhang reassigned FLINK-6381:
---
Assignee: mingleizhang
> Unnecessary synchronizing object in BucketingSink
>
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3567
@aljoscha i believe enough earth rotations have passed :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982781#comment-15982781
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6107:
---
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
GitHub user shijinkui opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3769
[FLINK-6367] support custom header settings of allow origin
`jobmanager.web.access-control-allow-origin`: Enable custom access control
parameter for allow origin header, default is `*`.
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982783#comment-15982783
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6367:
---
GitHub user shijinkui opened a pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
shijinkui reassigned FLINK-6367:
Assignee: shijinkui
> support custom header settings of allow origin
>
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3769#discussion_r113178604
--- Diff:
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/ConfigConstants.java ---
@@ -701,6 +701,9 @@
@Deprecated
public static final
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982787#comment-15982787
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6367:
---
Github user zentol commented on a diff in t
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3596
Thanks for the review @StephanEwen. You're right that it should not be
necessary to assign a name to the `TaskExecutor` and the `ResourceManager`.
Will change it so that these components assign
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982835#comment-15982835
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6155:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the i
Github user mtunique commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3720#discussion_r113186880
--- Diff: docs/Gemfile.lock ---
@@ -30,18 +30,19 @@ GEM
redcarpet (~> 3.1)
safe_yaml (~> 1.0)
toml (~> 0.1.0)
-jekyl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982838#comment-15982838
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6302:
---
Github user mtunique commented on a diff in
Github user mtunique commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3720#discussion_r113186869
--- Diff: docs/Gemfile.lock ---
@@ -30,18 +30,19 @@ GEM
redcarpet (~> 3.1)
safe_yaml (~> 1.0)
toml (~> 0.1.0)
-jekyl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982839#comment-15982839
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6302:
---
Github user mtunique commented on a diff in
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3596
I think I have to correct myself. In the general case, there might be the
need to connect from the dispatcher component to `ResourceManager`. If the
`ResourceManager` runs in a different process
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982887#comment-15982887
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6155:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982893#comment-15982893
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6361:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3762
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fabian Hueske closed FLINK-6361.
Resolution: Implemented
Fix Version/s: 1.3.0
Implemented with 589e45c5c50c328783f71d219c6606e
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3720#discussion_r113198925
--- Diff: docs/Gemfile.lock ---
@@ -30,18 +30,19 @@ GEM
redcarpet (~> 3.1)
safe_yaml (~> 1.0)
toml (~> 0.1.0)
-jekyll-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982899#comment-15982899
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6302:
---
Github user zentol commented on a diff in t
Github user sjwiesman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3752
@tzulitai you took interest in the jira ticket, would you be willing to
review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982904#comment-15982904
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6306:
---
Github user sjwiesman commented on the issu
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3720#discussion_r113201398
--- Diff: docs/Gemfile.lock ---
@@ -30,18 +30,19 @@ GEM
redcarpet (~> 3.1)
safe_yaml (~> 1.0)
toml (~> 0.1.0)
-jekyll-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982907#comment-15982907
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6302:
---
Github user zentol commented on a diff in t
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2696
I propose to merge this PR into the master such that it is disabled per
default. This entails that we don't require our own heartbeats from the TMs to
the `JobManager`.
This will make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982915#comment-15982915
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3347:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mingleizhang updated FLINK-6381:
Description:
It seems that currently there are two places should not employ the
{{synchronized}} to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
mingleizhang updated FLINK-6381:
Description:
It seems that currently there are two places should not employ the
{{synchronized}} to
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3622
Rebased onto the latest `master`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982921#comment-15982921
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6136:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982936#comment-15982936
]
Ufuk Celebi commented on FLINK-6337:
Just double checked this and I think you are righ
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
