[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9027) In the default egress allow network with existing egress rules to block traffic, restarting the network breaks the egress rules

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15346301#comment-15346301 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9027: - We've verified this on Cloudstack 4.8.0. T

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9405) listDomains API call takes an extremely long time to respond

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15316553#comment-15316553 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9405: - Steps to (easily) reproduce: 1. Authentic

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9405) listDomains API call takes an extremely long time to respond

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15314051#comment-15314051 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9405: - [~remibergsma]'s PR (CLOUDSTACK-9220) only

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9405) listDomains API call takes an extremely long time to respond

dsclose created CLOUDSTACK-9405: --- Summary: listDomains API call takes an extremely long time to respond Key: CLOUDSTACK-9405 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9405 Project: CloudStac

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-9400) RvR should present virtual IP for name resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose closed CLOUDSTACK-9400. --- Resolution: Not A Problem > RvR should present virtual IP for name resolution > -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9400) RvR should present virtual IP for name resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15310535#comment-15310535 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9400: - I was preparing a PR for this but after pu

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9400) RvR should present virtual IP for name resolution

dsclose created CLOUDSTACK-9400: --- Summary: RvR should present virtual IP for name resolution Key: CLOUDSTACK-9400 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9400 Project: CloudStack

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9385) Password Server is not running on RvR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15305346#comment-15305346 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9385: - Hi [~weizhou], please can you elaborate on

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9385) Password Server is not running on RvR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15304068#comment-15304068 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9385: - CLOUDSTACK-9035 suggests that the password

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9392) Networks with redundant network offerings can be implemented with standalone virtual routers.

dsclose created CLOUDSTACK-9392: --- Summary: Networks with redundant network offerings can be implemented with standalone virtual routers. Key: CLOUDSTACK-9392 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-939

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9183) CS 4.7.0 bash: /opt/cloud/bin/getRouterAlerts.sh: No such file or directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300037#comment-15300037 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9183: - I should also clarify that the above log e

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9183) CS 4.7.0 bash: /opt/cloud/bin/getRouterAlerts.sh: No such file or directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300023#comment-15300023 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9183: - I'm seeing this in 4.8: {code} 2016-05-25

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9183) CS 4.7.0 bash: /opt/cloud/bin/getRouterAlerts.sh: No such file or directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300035#comment-15300035 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9183: - These entries may also be related. Seeing

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-9385) Password Server is not running on RvR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose updated CLOUDSTACK-9385: Description: NB: I have not tested this on VPC routers. The cloud-passwd-srvr service fails on

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-9385) Password Server is not running on RvR

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose updated CLOUDSTACK-9385: Description: NB: I have not tested this on VPC routers. The cloud-passwd-srvr service fails on

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9385) Password Server is not running on RvR

dsclose created CLOUDSTACK-9385: --- Summary: Password Server is not running on RvR Key: CLOUDSTACK-9385 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9385 Project: CloudStack Issue Type:

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-9050) Virtual Router Static-NAT rules bind to wrong public interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose closed CLOUDSTACK-9050. --- Resolution: Not A Problem > Virtual Router Static-NAT rules bind to wrong public interface >

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15254093#comment-15254093 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - It looks like [~weizhou] was correct to pu

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose updated CLOUDSTACK-9339: Comment: was deleted (was: This commit deals with public interfaces being in the correct state

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose updated CLOUDSTACK-9339: Comment: was deleted (was: Started working on this as my employer needs a short-term fix. First

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15253658#comment-15253658 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - One last issue with a duplicated firewall

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6975) Service monitoring starts dnsmasq on backup router when using redundant VRs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15253529#comment-15253529 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-6975: - It works, I'll raise a PR shortly. > Serv

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6975) Service monitoring starts dnsmasq on backup router when using redundant VRs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15251736#comment-15251736 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-6975: - OK, great - I can raise a PR for that or d

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15226516#comment-15226516 ] dsclose edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-9339 at 4/18/16 5:37 PM: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15226516#comment-15226516 ] dsclose edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-9339 at 4/18/16 5:37 PM: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15235433#comment-15235433 ] dsclose edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-9339 at 4/18/16 5:36 PM: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15246083#comment-15246083 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - We appear to have gotten this sorted now.

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245804#comment-15245804 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - I incorporated the patch but it seems to h

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245574#comment-15245574 ] dsclose edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-9339 at 4/18/16 12:30 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245574#comment-15245574 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - That patch wouldn't apply to the branch I'

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245523#comment-15245523 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - Thanks Wei - I'll take a look at that patc

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245432#comment-15245432 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - I'll be raising a PR for this soon. I've s

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15235433#comment-15235433 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - The outbound static-NAT appears to be a co

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15230384#comment-15230384 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - There also appears to be an issue with rou

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15228270#comment-15228270 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - This commit deals with public interfaces b

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15226516#comment-15226516 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - Started working on this as my employer nee

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15226283#comment-15226283 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9339: - The iptables rules that allow forwarding b

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9339) Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces

dsclose created CLOUDSTACK-9339: --- Summary: Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces Key: CLOUDSTACK-9339 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9339 Project: CloudStack

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6975) Service monitoring starts dnsmasq on backup router when using redundant VRs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218035#comment-15218035 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-6975: - According to CLOUDSTACK-9035: * Passwords

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9035) [rVR] Password file is stored only with Master when we Reset Password on the VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218030#comment-15218030 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9035: - This appears to be relevant to CLOUDSTACK-

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6975) Service monitoring starts dnsmasq on backup router when using redundant VRs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218013#comment-15218013 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-6975: - This issue still exists in Cloudstack 4.8.

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-9024) Restart network fails if redundant router is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose closed CLOUDSTACK-9024. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.8.0 After upgrading from Cloudstack 4.5.2 to Cloudstack

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6975) Service monitoring starts dnsmasq on backup router when using redundant VRs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15201479#comment-15201479 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-6975: - It's not clear whether this issue persists

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9058) Password server causes Windows VMs to switch to blank passwords after each reboot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15001827#comment-15001827 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9058: - Solved the issue with a minor change to th

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9058) Password server causes Windows VMs to switch to blank passwords after each reboot

dsclose created CLOUDSTACK-9058: --- Summary: Password server causes Windows VMs to switch to blank passwords after each reboot Key: CLOUDSTACK-9058 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9058

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9050) Virtual Router Static-NAT rules bind to wrong public interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14998278#comment-14998278 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9050: - Solved the problem by forcing the grep to

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9050) Virtual Router Static-NAT rules bind to wrong public interface

dsclose created CLOUDSTACK-9050: --- Summary: Virtual Router Static-NAT rules bind to wrong public interface Key: CLOUDSTACK-9050 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9050 Project: CloudSt

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-9024) Restart network fails if redundant router is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose updated CLOUDSTACK-9024: Environment: Cloudstack 4.5.2, previously updated from Cloudstack 4.3, installed on CentOS 6.5

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-9024) Restart network fails if redundant router is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose updated CLOUDSTACK-9024: Description: Edit: Included details discussed in comments below. Restart network action fails

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-9024) Restart network fails if redundant router is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose updated CLOUDSTACK-9024: Description: Edit: Included details discussed in comments below. Restart network action fails

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-9024) Restart network fails if redundant router is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose updated CLOUDSTACK-9024: Description: Restart network action fails if a network is missing a redundant virtual router.

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-9024) Restart network fails if redundant router is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose updated CLOUDSTACK-9024: Description: Restart network action fails if a network is missing a redundant virtual router.

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-9024) Restart network fails if redundant router is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dsclose updated CLOUDSTACK-9024: Description: Restart network action fails if a network is missing a redundant virtual router.

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9024) Restart network fails if redundant router is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14989800#comment-14989800 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9024: - This may be related to issues Cloudstack-8

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8787) Network Update from Standalone VR offering to RVR offering is failing with Runtime Exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14989792#comment-14989792 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-8787: - The code that throws this exception: com.

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6433) Make sure redundant router would create a pair of routers when implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14989602#comment-14989602 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-6433: - This may have introduced a bug regarding r

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9024) Restart network fails if redundant router is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14989542#comment-14989542 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-9024: - This appears to have been introduced as pa

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8480) Unable to create instances

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14988606#comment-14988606 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-8480: - This appears to be related to http://mail

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9024) Restart network fails if redundant router is missing

dsclose created CLOUDSTACK-9024: --- Summary: Restart network fails if redundant router is missing Key: CLOUDSTACK-9024 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9024 Project: CloudStack

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6413) VirtualRouter Custom Disk Offering

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14960448#comment-14960448 ] dsclose commented on CLOUDSTACK-6413: - Customising individual system VMs undermin