Hi Wei PAN,
Thanks for your support.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:18:13AM +, Panwei (William) wrote:
> I've read the draft and support its adoption.
>
> A few comments:
> 1. Section 1.2 should use the new boilerplate for requirements language.
> 2. In Section 2,
>If the responder declines
Hi Antony,
> Currently, the draft aims to maintain consistency with USE_TRANSPORT,
> USE_AGGFRAG (RFC 9347), and USE_WESP_MODE (RFC 5840), as they
> follow a similar request response structure. That is why I chose this
> approach—though I acknowledge there may be room for refinemen
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-diet-esp-extension-04.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
(IPSECME) WG of the IETF.
Title: Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) extension for Header
Compression Profile (HCP)
Authors: Daniel Migau
This version addresses a number of issues raised by Valero and Wei:
- change from standard to experimental
- remove free form text field
- consolidate some delete reasons
- extend the write up of reasons to clarify their expected use cases
Paul
> On Mar 3, 2025, at 17:28, internet-dra...@iet
This update adds support for signaling initial child sa additional key
exchange methods.
Paul
> On Mar 3, 2025, at 13:39, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-pwouters-ipsecme-child-pfs-info-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Paul Wouters and
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-sa-ts-payloads-opt-04.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
(IPSECME) WG of the IETF.
Title: Optimized Rekeys in the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2
(IKEv2)
Authors: Sandeep Kampati
