Hi Wei PAN, Thanks for your support.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:18:13AM +0000, Panwei (William) wrote: > I've read the draft and support its adoption. > > A few comments: > 1. Section 1.2 should use the new boilerplate for requirements language. > 2. In Section 2, > If the responder declines and does > not include the USE_BEET_MODE notification in the response, the child > SA may be established without BEET mode enabled. If this is > unacceptable to the initiator, the initiator MUST delete the child > SA. > First, the "child SA" should be "Child SA". thanks for spotting that. > Second, I think the "may" here isn't appropriate. Using "may" can result in > different processing in two peers, what if the initiator doesn't create the > Child SA but the responder does. Combining with the last sentence, I think > the processing here is that both sides need to create this Child SA without > BEET mode enabled. Currently, the draft aims to maintain consistency with USE_TRANSPORT, USE_AGGFRAG (RFC 9347), and USE_WESP_MODE (RFC 5840), as they follow a similar request response structure. That is why I chose this approach—though I acknowledge there may be room for refinement. The initiator is committing to default Tunnel Mode, but it has the flexibility to immediately delete the default tunnel if Tunnel mode is unacceptable. It would be interesting to explore whether other USE_* mechanisms exist in various RFCs. To understang how it work when several of these are chained together. regards, -antony > > Regards & Thanks！ > Wei PAN (潘伟) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> > > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 10:53 PM > > To: ipsec@ietf.org > > Subject: [IPsec] WG Adoption call of > > draft-antony-ipsecme-iekv2-beet-mode > > > > This email starts two week working group adoption call for > > draft-antony-ipsecme-iekv2-beet-mode [1] document. If you are in favor > > of adoption this document as working group document, please reply to > > this email and say so. And especially if you have any objections for > > adopting this document as WG document, send those comments to the > > list too. > > > > [1] > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-antony-ipsecme-iekv2-beet-mode/ > > -- > > kivi...@iki.fi > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
