Reading this thread, I'm slightly confused as to which part we are now bike
shedding. I think it's the use of the term 'anti-replay protection' which
occurs like 16 times in the -00 I-D. I haven't seen the newly posted draft yet.
1. I don't have a problem with "Sequence Number Properties" for t
Hi,
> Paul Wouters writes:
> > On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> > > So, my question: what term should we use to be aligned with RFC
> > > 4301-4303 and to not confuse readers? Perhaps this is a
> > > bikeshedding, but an important one.
>
> Oh, my shepherd writeup already mentions this
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn-01.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (IPSECME) WG of
the IETF.
Title: Renaming Extended Sequence Number (ESN) Transform Type in the
Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)
Autho
Hi,
this version addresses comments made during WGLC.
Regards,
Valery.
> -Original Message-
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:01 PM
> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn-01.t
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Ready
I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area
Directors. Document authors, document edi
I've read the new version (-01) and think it's all in good shape.
The current use of "replay protection" and "anti-replay service" is clear to me.
I've already been using "replay protection" in
draft-pan-ipsecme-anti-replay-notification, and "anti-replay service" will be
used when needed.
Regar
HI Michael,
> Reading this thread, I'm slightly confused as to which part we are now bike
> shedding. I think it's the use of the term 'anti-replay protection' which
> occurs like
> 16 times in the -00 I-D.
Exactly.
> I haven't seen the newly posted draft yet.
>
> 1. I don't have a problem