[IPsec] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn passes

2024-12-16 Thread Michael Richardson
Reading this thread, I'm slightly confused as to which part we are now bike shedding. I think it's the use of the term 'anti-replay protection' which occurs like 16 times in the -00 I-D. I haven't seen the newly posted draft yet. 1. I don't have a problem with "Sequence Number Properties" for t

[IPsec] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn passes

2024-12-16 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi, > Paul Wouters writes: > > On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, Valery Smyslov wrote: > > > So, my question: what term should we use to be aligned with RFC > > > 4301-4303 and to not confuse readers? Perhaps this is a > > > bikeshedding, but an important one. > > Oh, my shepherd writeup already mentions this

[IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn-01.txt

2024-12-16 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn-01.txt is now available. It is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (IPSECME) WG of the IETF. Title: Renaming Extended Sequence Number (ESN) Transform Type in the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) Autho

[IPsec] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn-01.txt

2024-12-16 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi, this version addresses comments made during WGLC. Regards, Valery. > -Original Message- > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:01 PM > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > Cc: ipsec@ietf.org > Subject: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn-01.t

[IPsec] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-18

2024-12-16 Thread Russ Housley via Datatracker
Reviewer: Russ Housley Review result: Ready I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area Directors. Document authors, document edi

[IPsec] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn passes

2024-12-16 Thread Panwei (William)
I've read the new version (-01) and think it's all in good shape. The current use of "replay protection" and "anti-replay service" is clear to me. I've already been using "replay protection" in draft-pan-ipsecme-anti-replay-notification, and "anti-replay service" will be used when needed. Regar

[IPsec] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn passes

2024-12-16 Thread Valery Smyslov
HI Michael, > Reading this thread, I'm slightly confused as to which part we are now bike > shedding. I think it's the use of the term 'anti-replay protection' which > occurs like > 16 times in the -00 I-D. Exactly. > I haven't seen the newly posted draft yet. > > 1. I don't have a problem