Reading this thread, I'm slightly confused as to which part we are now bike shedding. I think it's the use of the term 'anti-replay protection' which occurs like 16 times in the -00 I-D. I haven't seen the newly posted draft yet.
1. I don't have a problem with "Sequence Number Properties" for the title of the
registry.
2. It's weird that we call it *anti* replay protection, yet QUIC/TLS call it
replay protection. Like both senses of the term mean the same thing? :-)
3. "OK, I used "replay protection" and "anti-replay service", and mentioned,"
I'm good with this.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
