Hi Antony,
> Hi Tero,
> I support advancing this document.
>
> Valery,
> I wonder Number or Numbers. May be double check?
> I think following are the correct use, in singular.
My reasoning for using plural form is that we here are speaking about the
properties
of not a single sequence number (in
Hi Tero,
I support advancing this document.
Valery,
I wonder Number or Numbers. May be double check?
I think following are the correct use, in singular.
"Sequence Number Properties (SNP)" instead of
"Sequence Numbers Properties (SNP)"
"Partially Transmitted 64-bit Sequential Number" instead of
"
Hi Tero,
Just following up on this; it appears that -18 has been posted with the changes
in question.
Thank you!
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Tue Dec 03 14:23:51 2024, kivi...@iki.fi wrote:
> David Dong via RT writes:
> > Dear Tero Kivinen, (cc: ipsecme WG),
> >
>
Thanks to the authors and the reviewers!
I suspect that there may be some nits and changes that will be made, but
I'm going to issue the ballot for this now for the 6 Feb telechat (there
are some pretty full telechats between 19 Dec and 6 Feb). So there is
ample time to make sure the IANA regist
Hi,
I've read the document and I support it.
One nit:
The document talkes about 'anti-replay protection' which sounds
a bit odd. We protect against replay, not anti-replay.
ESP RFC 4303 talkes about 'anti-replay service' or just 'anti-replay'.
Maybe the document can be aligned with terms used i
