Hi Valery,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 06:18:35PM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> Hi Antony,
>
> > > > Number NameReference
> > > > 0 32-bit Sequential Numbers (SN) [RFC7296]
> [this ID]
> > > > 1 64-bit Sequential Numbers (ESN) [RFC7296] [this ID]
> > > >
Hi Antony,
> > > Number NameReference
> > > 0 32-bit Sequential Numbers (SN) [RFC7296]
[this ID]
> > > 1 64-bit Sequential Numbers (ESN) [RFC7296] [this ID]
> > > 2 32-bit Unspecified [this ID]
> > > 3-65535
Hi Paul,
In a charter discussion, references to drafts typically serve to
demonstrate that some progress has been made or is currently underway
within the solution space. These drafts are presented as a starting point,
which does not preclude the consideration of alternative proposals.
On Tue, No
Hi Valery,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 09:28:05AM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> Hi Tero,
>
> > Valery Smyslov writes:
> > > Hi Antony,
> > > Combining with the proposal above:
> > >
> > > Number NameReference
> > > 0 32-bit Sequential Numbers (SN) [RFC7296] [this
> > >
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 05:31:00AM +0200, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Valery Smyslov writes:
> > Hi Antony,
> > Combining with the proposal above:
> >
> > Number NameReference
> > 0 32-bit Sequential Numbers (SN) [RFC7296] [this ID]
> > 1 64-bit Sequential Numbers (ESN)
Daniel Migault writes:
> In a charter discussion, references to drafts typically serve to demonstrate
> that some progress has been made or is currently underway within the solution
> space. These drafts are presented as a starting point, which does not preclude
> the consideration of alternative p
Valery:
>> I find the use of GIKE_REKEY and GSA_REKEY a little bit confusing.
>> I think it would help the reader if these were discussed a bit in the
>> Introduction.
>
> GSA_REKEY is an type of G-IKEv2 (pseudo) exchange, it appears in the G-IKEv2
> Header (Exchange Type field).
> The GIKE_REK
Valery Smyslov writes:
> Some candidates:
>
> Sequence Number Properties (SNP)
> Sequence Number Interpretation (SNI) (can be mixed up with SNI in TLS)
> Sequence Number Features (SNF)
>
> Thoughts? Other proposals?
All of those works for me, just pick whatever you like. SNP sounds
fine...
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 06:54:02AM +0200, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Antony Antony writes:
> > I have a minor clarification question.
> > Would this cover the work proposed in draft-antony-ipsecme-ikev2-beet-mode?
> >
> > I imagine it does, but I’m seeking confirmation because at the Dublin
> > meet
Hi Antony,
> > Some candidates:
> >
> > Sequence Number Properties (SNP)
Got it, thanks.
> SNP sounds good to me as well. However, I have a question about the IKEv2 IANA
> document. Would the registry end up being titled simply 'Sequence Number
> Properties Transforms ID'?
Yes (to be pedantic:
10 matches
Mail list logo
