Daniel Migault writes: > In a charter discussion, references to drafts typically serve to demonstrate > that some progress has been made or is currently underway within the solution > space. These drafts are presented as a starting point, which does not preclude > the consideration of alternative proposals.
I do not plan to put draft names in the charter, some of them will appear in the milestones but having them in the charter has not been that good idea. > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 1:51 PM Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2024, Daniel Migault wrote: > > > I would like to add something around: Other protocols aim at > handling fragmentation as well as the management > > of > DSCP. draft-liu-ipsecme-ikev2-mtu-dect and draft-mglt-ipsecme-dscp-np are > expected to be considered as > > starting points. > > I don't think there is agreement on this. > > <mglt>Please provide clarification regarding the term 'this.' If you are > suggesting that the drafts are controversial, we find this claim to be > unfounded. We have gathered comprehensive feedback, and all suggestions have My understanding is that there has not been support in the working group for working on this topic. Yes, people have read the draft, and had have comments on them, but I do not remember that many people saying they will be implementing this, or that they really need this. Also, I did not see anybody in the WG coming up and saying that they would support adding that item to the charter. Even if the solution is perfect and all feedback has been processed, that does not mean it is something for this working group to publish. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
