Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-14: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://
Peter, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this
document based on my own review.
Lars
> On 2022-5-28, at 23:59, Peter Yee via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Peter Yee
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The Ge
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Joel, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
> On 2022-7-22, at 2:23, Joel Halpern via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (
Lars Eggert via Datatracker writes:
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-14: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragra
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer t
Hi Paul
I have bytes burned into my brain, however the IETF interface YANG stats RFC
7223 - and others, typically use octets for the named packet counters so we
tried to be consistent with that. Maybe a question for the RFC editor if we
should change the text description or it is clear enough.
Replying to COMMENT here..
Given a few of the comments I think it's useful to point this out at the top.
This document defines a constant send rate tunnel of OUTER packets, the actual
data encapsulated is not constant rate and so can and will be encapsulated
along with padding in the outer pa
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, Don Fedyk wrote:
I have bytes burned into my brain, however the IETF interface YANG stats RFC
7223 - and others, typically use octets for the named packet counters so we
tried to be consistent with that. Maybe a question for the RFC editor if we
should change the text des
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker writes:
> ## DISCUSS
>
> As noted in https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/, a
> DISCUSS ballot is a request to have a discussion on the following topics:
>
> ### Section 6.1
>
> ```
>An AGGFRAG payload is identified by the ESP Next Header value
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-14: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-14: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https:
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Warren Kumari via Datatracker writes:
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-14: Discuss
--
DISCUSS:
--
How a
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions WG of
the IETF.
Title : IP-TFS: Aggregation and Fragmentation Mode for ESP
and its Use for IP Traffic Flow Security
It has been suggested that adding an implementation status section to the draft would
help with IESG evaluation. Thus, version 15 of the document has been published with an
added "Implementation Status" section discussing 2 known implementations (one
full and complete, one in progress)
Thank
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions WG of
the IETF.
Title : IP-TFS: Aggregation and Fragmentation Mode for ESP
and its Use for IP Traffic Flow Security
It has been suggested that adding an implementation status section to the draft
would help with IESG evaluation. Thus, version 15 of the document has been
published with an added "Implementation Status" section discussing 2 known
implementations (one full and complete, one in progress)
An upd
18 matches
Mail list logo
