Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# GEN AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-08

CC @larseggert

Thanks to Joel Halpern for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/HzETo-2ZxQTq94b5aj8EjHrFt70).

## Comments

### Boilerplate

This document uses the RFC2119 keywords ['SHOULD NOT', 'OPTIONAL', 'REQUIRED',
'SHOULD', 'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', 'SHALL NOT', 'MUST', 'MUST NOT',
'RECOMMENDED', 'SHALL'], but does not contain the recommended RFC8174
boilerplate. (It contains some text with a similar beginning.)

## Nits

All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
did with these suggestions.

### Boilerplate

Document still refers to the "Simplified BSD License", which was corrected in
the TLP on September 21, 2021. It should instead refer to the "Revised BSD
License".

### URLs

These URLs point to tools.ietf.org, which is being deprecated:

 * https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX
 * https://tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/

### Grammar/style

#### Section 2, paragraph 4
```
t the packet-size and timing independently from any receiver. Both direction
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
The usual collocation for "independently" is "of", not "from". Did you mean
"independently of"?

## Notes

This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the
[`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT].

[ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
[ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments
[IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool



_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to