A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Tero Kivinen, a Chair
of the ipsecme working group.
-
Working Group Name: IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
Area Name: Security Area
Session Requester: Tero Kivinen
Number o
I would like to be able to attend. My only other conflict is DRIP.
My only pressing interest here is diet-esp.
On 5/6/22 13:40, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool wrote:
A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Tero Kivinen, a Chair
of the ipsecme working group.
Hi!
I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-05. Thanks for this
complementary work to draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs. Feedback is below.
** Section 2. Editorial. s/ipsec/IPsec/
** Section 2. Typo. s/to fll/to fill/
** Section 2. Typo? Per "RFC [RFC9061] has a set of ", this st
Hi!
In reviewing the corresponding YANG module for this document, I was reminded
that IP-TFS SA are unidirectional. In principle it would be possible to setup
an IP-TFS tunnel for only one side of a connection. Section 8 should mention
that risk that this introduces.
Regards,
Roman
> -O
First read-through.
Is there an implementation of this draft?
Obviously it being last published in '19 some drafts are now RFCs and
thus need updating.
Page 5 at top:
Non ESP fields may be compressed by ESP under
certain circumstances, but EHC is not intended to provide a generic
way o
