We are experiencing the problems described in RFC 7018 (Auto-Discovery VPN
Problem Statement and Requirements), i.e. the problem of enabling a large
number of peers (primarily Gateway) to communicate directly using IPsec to
protect the traffic between them.
Is there any drafts describing the s
Hi Linda,
We published the following draft for AutoDiscovery VPN. It is already
implemented by Juniper and other major vendors.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sathyanarayan-ipsecme-advpn-03
Thanks,
Praveen
From: IPsec on behalf of Linda Dunbar
Sent: Monday
Linda,There were 4 drafts written based on the existing state of art at that
time.We created one as HP and H3C about 6 years back. Cisco had one too and so
did
others.https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mao-ipsecme-ad-vpn-protocol-02-Vishwas
Original message From: Linda Dunbar
D
Vishwas,
Thank you very much for the link. The draft was dated aug 2013.
Why it didn’t move forward?
Linda
From: vishwas.ietf
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 12:32 PM
To: Linda Dunbar ; ipsec@ietf.org WG
Subject: RE: [IPsec] Is there any drafts or RFCs on solutions to RFC 7018
Auto-Discovery VP
On Mon, 18 May 2020, Linda Dunbar wrote:
We are experiencing the problems described in RFC 7018 (Auto-Discovery VPN
Problem Statement and Requirements), i.e. the problem of enabling a large
number of peers
(primarily Gateway) to communicate directly using IPsec to protect the traffic
between
