Vishwas, Thank you very much for the link. The draft was dated aug 2013. Why it didn’t move forward?
Linda From: vishwas.ietf <vishwas.i...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 12:32 PM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@futurewei.com>; ipsec@ietf.org WG <ipsec@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [IPsec] Is there any drafts or RFCs on solutions to RFC 7018 Auto-Discovery VPN Problem Statement and Requirements? Linda, There were 4 drafts written based on the existing state of art at that time. We created one as HP and H3C about 6 years back. Cisco had one too and so did others. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mao-ipsecme-ad-vpn-protocol-02 -Vishwas -------- Original message -------- From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dun...@futurewei.com>> Date: 5/18/20 10:13 AM (GMT-08:00) To: "ipsec@ietf.org WG<mailto:ipsec@ietf.org%20WG>" <ipsec@ietf.org<mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>> Subject: [IPsec] Is there any drafts or RFCs on solutions to RFC 7018 Auto-Discovery VPN Problem Statement and Requirements? We are experiencing the problems described in RFC 7018 (Auto-Discovery VPN Problem Statement and Requirements), i.e. the problem of enabling a large number of peers (primarily Gateway) to communicate directly using IPsec to protect the traffic between them. Is there any drafts describing the solutions to the problems identified by RFC7018? Thank you very much, Linda Dunbar
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
