Hi everyone,
I am leaving Check Point within the next few weeks. For the time being,
I will be using this address: yaronf.i...@gmail.com.
Unfortunately I will not be coming to Anaheim next week, instead I will
make the best of the WebEx facilities. Wishing you all a good meeting in
sunny Cal
Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > > > - Section 5.7.4: "It also includes 3 EC DH groups (groups 19-21)
> >> > that were previously defined in [RFC4753]". The normative
> >> > specification for groups 19-21 in IKE is still 4753/5753bis, so I
> >> > would propose just omitting this sentence.
> >>
> >> OK
At 1:38 PM +0100 3/16/10, wrote:
>Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
>> > > > - Section 5.7.4: "It also includes 3 EC DH groups (groups 19-21)
>> >> > that were previously defined in [RFC4753]". The normative
>> >> > specification for groups 19-21 in IKE is still 4753/5753bis, so I
>> >> > would propose ju
[[ This message has gotten no replies. I am far from a PF_KEY expert, and need
to hear from the WG before proceeding. --Paul Hoffman ]]
At 4:34 PM -0500 3/2/10, Dan McDonald wrote:
>Even as of draft-08, section 2.9:
>
> When an RFC4301-compliant IPsec subsystem receives an IP packet that
> ma
