Hi folks.
5 issues got lost in the system (they were tagged wrong). Hopefully these are
really the last 5.
Issue #132 - Should NO_ADDITIONAL_SAS cover rekeying IKE SAs?
=
In section 1.3 at the end there is text talking about the NO_ADDI
Dan McDonald writes:
> Am reading this right?
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:22:51AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > At 1:10 PM +0200 2/19/10, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> > >Yoav Nir writes:
> > >> Hi all.
> > >>
> > >> There are only three issues this time, because this is the last batch.
> > >>
> > > >
Yoav Nir writes:
> Issue #133 - Adding more possible notifications when rekeying Child SAs
> ===
> (nice touch that issue #133 deals with section 1.3.3)
> How about just adding the following paragraph:
>The notifications descri
Ed,
I started to review the NIST SP 800-119 today. My focus has been to
look at the document from both the defenders and attackers
prospective, as I did with the DOD IPv6 security standards.
As usual with documents from Sheila Frankel, it is well written,
annotated and filled allot of useful info
The IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme) working group in the
Security Area of the IETF has been rechartered. For additional
information, please contact the Area Directors or the working group
Chairs.
IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme)
---
