Yoav Nir writes: > Issue #133 - Adding more possible notifications when rekeying Child SAs > ======================================================================= > (nice touch that issue #133 deals with section 1.3.3) > How about just adding the following paragraph: > The notifications described in [Section 1.3.1] may also be sent in a > rekeying exchange. Usually they will be the same notifications used > in the original exchange, for example, if we're rekeying a transport > mode SA, the USE_TRANSPORT_MODE notification will be used. > > I have used "will" rather than "SHOULD" as we are not specifying any > more of those when interoperability is not at issue.
The suggested paragraph is ok, and I agree on the using word will instead of should. I also (still) agree on other issues you posted... -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
