Hopps
Subject: RE: [IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipsecme-yang-iptfs
Don Fedyk writes:
> Can we republish this draft as a WG ie
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-00.yang ?
There is no need for that now. The adopted WG drafts are marked as such in the
datatracker when I get that
Don Fedyk writes:
> Can we republish this draft as a WG ie
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-00.yang ?
There is no need for that now. The adopted WG drafts are marked as
such in the datatracker when I get that far in my process of getting
things ready for the ietf, and then when next revision of th
Hi
Can we republish this draft as a WG ie draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-00.yang ?
Thanks,
Don & Chris
-Original Message-
From: IPsec On Behalf Of Tero Kivinen
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2021 9:00 PM
To: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: [IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipsecme-yang-iptfs
I think yang definition is a necessary compliment of
draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs, so support the adoption of this document.
On 1/24/2021 8:59 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
This is the start of 3 week WG adoption call for this document, ending
2021-02-15. Please send your reply about whether you support
Since we’re yang-ing all the things - sure let’s adopt it.
spt
> On Jan 24, 2021, at 20:59, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
> This is the start of 3 week WG adoption call for this document, ending
> 2021-02-15. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting
> this document as WG document or no
Support as co-author, and I'm not aware of any IPR for this document.
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Jan 24, 2021, at 8:59 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
> This is the start of 3 week WG adoption call for this document, ending
> 2021-02-15. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting
> this docum
Support as an author,
Thanks
Don Fedyk
-Original Message-
From: IPsec On Behalf Of Tero Kivinen
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2021 9:00 PM
To: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: [IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipsecme-yang-iptfs
This is the start of 3 week WG adoption call for this document,
