Hi Tero OK. We have published a new version that addresses your comments and brings this model up to date with the main draft. Also, since we augment another YANG that is still undergoing a bit of change (during IESG review), the supplied test configurations were adjusted to satisfy those changes.
We also have submitted a MIB module in another draft that is organized based on the YANG module for using SNMP to read the configuration. Thanks Don -----Original Message----- From: Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:06 AM To: Don Fedyk <dfe...@labn.net> Cc: ipsec@ietf.org; Christian Hopps <cho...@labn.net> Subject: RE: [IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipsecme-yang-iptfs Don Fedyk writes: > Can we republish this draft as a WG ie > draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-00.yang ? There is no need for that now. The adopted WG drafts are marked as such in the datatracker when I get that far in my process of getting things ready for the ietf, and then when next revision of the draft is needed, it can either be published as new name, or continue using the old name. Usually there is no point of republishing the draft unless there is any changes. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
