Hi,
After a discussion on the scope of this draft, I decided to change my
opinion regarding what I said during the IETF meeting: now, I am ready
to review the draft but no more to contribute to it.
Best regards.
JMC.
2009/11/29 Yaron Sheffer :
> This work item will define the problem statement
I will also review this document.
Regards,
Daniel
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>
>> This work item will define the problem statement and requirements for a
>> solution that allows interoperable HA/LS device groups. Mixed-vendor
>> clusters are
Yaron Sheffer wrote:
This work item will define the problem statement and requirements for a
solution that allows interoperable HA/LS device groups. Mixed-vendor
clusters are specifically out of scope; but single-vendor clusters
should be fully interoperable with other vendors’ devices or clust
If this proposal is accepted, I commit to review it.
Scott Moonen (smoo...@us.ibm.com)
z/OS Communications Server TCP/IP Development
http://www.linkedin.com/in/smoonen
From:
Yaron Sheffer
To:
"ipsec@ietf.org"
Date:
11/29/2009 12:41 PM
Subject:
[IPsec] Proposed work item: IKE/IPsec high availa
Hi Team,
According to me, High Availability needs protocol level support from IKEv2
due to windowing and sequence numbers in IPsec.
This will enhance performance and avoid proprietary versions of different
vendors. Here we can discuss various problem and solution of IPsec and HA,
which surely need
