I will also review this document. Regards, Daniel On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> Yaron Sheffer wrote: > >> This work item will define the problem statement and requirements for a >> solution that allows interoperable HA/LS device groups. Mixed-vendor >> clusters are specifically out of scope; but single-vendor clusters should be >> fully interoperable with other vendors’ devices or clusters. The main >> challenge is to overcome the strict use of sequence numbers in both IPsec >> and IKE, in HA and LS scenarios. Following the Hiroshima discussion, the WI >> is initially focused on defining the problem, rather than a particular >> solution. >> >> >> Proposed starting point: >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-ipsecme-ipsecha-00.txt. >> >> >> Please reply to the list: >> > > It is interesting work, and may well be valuable. > It is not a priority to me, and I would not have time to work on it. > I might read a WG FC, and I might respond to threads, if I came across > them. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > -- Daniel Migault Orange Labs -- Security +33 6 70 72 69 58
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
